From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B721F601 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 22:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eweA4Szg"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231509AbiLAWpv (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:45:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36382 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231490AbiLAWpt (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:45:49 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0707B2654C for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 14:45:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id k7so3032876pll.6 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 14:45:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=fLumxDwNQdCESVkZA6mdWnmKkFhGXuUFOUDG9vPML2s=; b=eweA4SzgBE/xk09dowPsTNrMkDgem9Bn7GJW/NHQGaW8VW/eE+fg+GNxVhJ3ylBM3b 1YdCUZ5GIKxghb0xT3d+oixlmLPcGmweOJjqOqOhWIHZAeQBVkG15AERtu2JuxDD2j1E ocJfT+uuwufMjqqo8GQ0LqewnUW16DBg4HvOW9qWU7Ll0h5+ih3Ts17j7bVtQfKYO7og 3byqSjiaHrr8m9U250qclxYhipKqOHQMAmnfWBfF/OXcw0F9fVSHbIrFwX8WL1fvGAuQ jIkvtFF5yU2k8e+WJQkelxoBP/z7DaqUetYRn5T0SpbzTVDlY4XY6lljoNdXqnrbP5bB yk/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fLumxDwNQdCESVkZA6mdWnmKkFhGXuUFOUDG9vPML2s=; b=YNpXyI5n1c3pNssRwZstuW+6IntmeuNM9jHhFCebsNNrQj0gOzvi9X9ByA2ooqFfv1 DmUc3MqFualpaHccQcldidzLDyCjVmqinwSV77qdnB3nUU1R063BFvLf/mJn/4uRvUzq WrKkuC/ckwOdgJKLiEVJCJNCHGcT5a3lWZvGLb4RM/jD5kS2SafOorwwEJ+LRsfoMFRj PMCT7TI9F8xAJfJVD7hoRvKS50Scs8V9DAcyHaac7hwCnHMfBEoYwDxnmnQiavSxvyTx GpgilVhNZQwSkmXyicabCpNCWRJSbG2h+c8TUAro6rU/hJIsfCKuZM/9xkzzsFWAlRT5 kKzg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pn7n2jFb4MMdYdLgWIISshLp8pRm69MdPf3BpTrWVjaFMTYg+7x qhXrtQ547wTqt3ChWJWi+iw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7u1XG0h10JPHNsWsY9lQcM8YX5GQaU8D2qQjaTFET1WrjFrcJ/w+vkL3a0N9Cv3yx6rtET/g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3444:b0:214:e1:cabe with SMTP id lj4-20020a17090b344400b0021400e1cabemr50780413pjb.153.1669934748409; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 14:45:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s29-20020aa78bdd000000b005749f5d9d07sm3856909pfd.99.2022.12.01.14.45.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Dec 2022 14:45:47 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Rudy Rigot Cc: Rudy Rigot via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Hostetler , Taylor Blau , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Derrick Stolee , Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] status: modernize git-status "slow untracked files" advice References: Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 07:45:47 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Rudy Rigot's message of "Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:16:46 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Rudy Rigot writes: >> (I thought you were going to update the proposed >> log message, too, though) > > Oh, I'm sorry, what do you mean by updating the proposed log message? > I'm looking back at past feedback, and I can't seem to match it to an > unaddressed one. It was not intentional, so I would be very glad to > fix it if you'd like, I'll gladly leave it up to you. > > Thanks a lot! I was referring to this part: >> ... I don't think it provides compellingly more information >> for end users, compared to just mentioning time, so I'll simplify with >> your proposal here. in https://lore.kernel.org/git/CANaDLW+ukK2GU7NzkCvXVNc9DX3_93Pp+PHq-WcLpRJizPidVA@mail.gmail.com/ you sent earlier. No big deal, and thanks for working on this.