From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Suggest applicants to participate in review of other peoples' patches Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 13:57:40 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1425642837-31651-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> <20150306211048.GB24267@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Matthieu Moy , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 06 22:57:53 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YU0Fl-0005fe-15 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 22:57:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753943AbbCFV5s (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:57:48 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:52004 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752608AbbCFV5r (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:57:47 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAEF3EF4D; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:57:42 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=SdvRLDYrVcZsTW5EsN0npdsVkoA=; b=wseE8V dpFPhJPdzGEa0koX3YS+2F49mBJK1NrdOWIycYhb7Ht6Ez+PdN4mpb2qre1ebyP3 +Q2j8bEBvjKaQjzhlqw91rJogmyJfFy6i764arG9TPNfCpc7cure0vOwTN4udI+U SSQLXBkGsv/8s9IWyzr//ZtAu4EUBkLOvuDhs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RhNDBcoeju1LRwEIstuKvBB+G6iab2zE gnBsX+H8qqM9U/DbhoTCwM1WCtb6EZVCZWGXSXU7MZLrYHB/Gfwn9mhBdtdeqMf3 q3jCLQrOA4AzEhZbxkvrQn3v9YO+xj/QfNnhJke0ghaq1NMJhuAsg54x7wgCDlp7 xeHWSTAv35E= Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B7D3EF4C; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:57:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A69513EF49; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:57:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20150306211048.GB24267@peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 6 Mar 2015 16:10:48 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CFDD544E-C44B-11E4-8C6E-29999F42C9D4-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:53:57PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: > >> Idea and most of the wording comes from Junio's message on the list. I >> added a hint to include links to review in the application (which makes >> the suggestion a bit stronger since it implies that it will be taken into >> account in the selection). > > Seems reasonable. I do not know what the quality of reviews will be from > applicants, but I guess we will find out. :) I actually was hoping to see an applicant replaying the review comments given to him to another applicant that makes the same kind of mistakes. That is a fairly easy entry to get into reviewing process---even you may not yet know what you are suggesting the other to do is the norm in this community, if a more experienced person told you something similar, it would be likely it is.