From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63BA1F859 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754723AbcIGQQ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:16:29 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51110 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752586AbcIGQQ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:16:28 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066C93AA5B; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:16:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=7eF4xT1pGu2m GCKj2A3jZmCqNuY=; b=DQl8xez7UMIchH+2BL8KodLK6yg2Oh7WbjkpXFwF65JG SCzG4+cE2cvrk1pDKF9W3rNGWd/P7GDAnMrE3esVUBNyCfDxAJA96OprSnh7aDoP ryyS6UI4CaNvVIYuIPT/PPNrPftFEF8fqlNGDYXdGXawmvDJdDLOakYbrxUJVYE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nY5IH5 x6fU1tRdUYq90nh4ffdfQ7k2EV9NuCRj4QAklYp3ipdgwzjkWL0wz6d8G/hnXsAk JgSHapH+sGfj7ZfE819g36mzp6ahhObGEnINer5k3wDrZ3VTmQIQFTBvp5FaKbmj nu21sghStn/wtHIUd8rqmAGvTkwF/OCAR3Ha4= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EE23AA5A; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:16:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AF073AA59; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:16:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: A note from the maintainer References: <77c9288d-4b4d-fda8-a1eb-dab4b5056b1d@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 09:16:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <77c9288d-4b4d-fda8-a1eb-dab4b5056b1d@gmail.com> ("Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski=22's?= message of "Sat, 3 Sep 2016 12:26:11 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6D47AC4E-7516-11E6-AAA8-F7BB12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jakub Nar=C4=99bski writes: > W dniu 03.09.2016 o 04:17, Junio C Hamano pisze: > >> Please remember to always state >>=20 >> - what you wanted to achieve; >>=20 >> - what you did (the version of git and the command sequence to reprod= uce >> the behavior); > > I wonder if it be worth adding to not use aliases (or expand them). I = have > seen quite a few such questions on StackOverflow... - how others can reproduce what you did (the version of git and the command sequence); perhaps? >>=20 >> - what you saw happen (X above); >>=20 >> - what you expected to see (Y above); and >>=20 >> - how the last two are different.