From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A0B203F3 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756247AbdGXTLQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:11:16 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54961 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756182AbdGXTJP (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:09:15 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB09920BE; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:09:13 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=/3FkvxQud2wbchbQFZng9Tee0VQ=; b=TauQBd ta5xvnV1H4aT5SMBLHIASZqFZEKkNiOzC+X+CmqSL/OdtlUJEipJ/Y29tZnePuxh dZfbMOdNWMgUxTxq2YueFg7g9ESXkwVCy0K6qj6O1S+5nxrmAESzMcKWN1g5s6c1 J9XkVFR6G5TZhXhtPAWWq6uSyRPWD5tRIIeJ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=PWkcCk4pkZUdUV4RsikrOqVkSvaC7zg7 zCUazvhdPgrGLvWNV8jGnO4lg6c56Aax6zSAud6JzCevdL+N17cC2pEyhseBHZNT aYOvRWWxyxYcF33O8Z41ev3kXPSjojI+XwJpJGT7dtTpuNlITgKBiAQRsrKsBhH1 d14PeUAGrsM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FDF920BD; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:09:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DF6A920B9; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:09:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jiang Xin Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Git List , =?utf-8?Q?Jean-No=C3=ABl?= Avila Subject: Re: [PATCH] PRItime: wrap PRItime for better l10n compatibility References: <249ac6f8-af3c-4b20-5bf0-87a82866cc7a@free.fr> <3ccfa2fb49d471f807d77d9a280e4b7cfe56faea.1500304209.git.worldhello.net@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:09:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jiang Xin's message of "Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:38:17 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9403AAE8-70A3-11E7-8A67-61520C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jiang Xin writes: >> So let's go with Junio's patch. > > I agree. We just go with the sed-then-cleanup version until we meet > ambiguities (I mean some words other than PRItime need to be > replaced). OK, thanks for all involved to get us to a conclusion. Jiang, I saw you already made an announcement for the second round. Thank you very much for doing so without waiting me---I was stuck on something else and my morning was blown X-<. I'll still try to tag -rc1 by the end of business today.