From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659161F463 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390894AbfITQuk (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:50:40 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:56438 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390491AbfITQuk (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:50:40 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9F1967A7; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:50:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=DmEBFBb6/+22Zdo6hhl/kTa9PdQ=; b=B4XBPf dM0ethED3N3kKwgch0e3v1UTm1hELqxlSb4dPbL0Xh397EX0exksz3Ok7LL+Xzt7 7hwhf6oklwIIVK2rq+JoHOVrybzafRr+uAW/E032tmvv+cXsf5cudlnQs6ZQrzfW 6UvGvRWmXYa2gDrhC1uvUrsEkSI4BFVLB1Bo8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=MunFbi4JBns33AGCur4IYU99P+GoADw5 Re6iHKA7QH7Vu0lKR3X985UNHvS45yySgCTLeO+zsyiX1FUjiqQyBI8mMTn/zP5Y 3mn7s/c9cey5oWdwGGse4JLslmrVy3cNNJ1keWy17SokHNG2gBBE0Q7aaUfMsaE4 rue1U3Y4vpk= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44768967A6; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:50:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66E18967A3; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:50:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2019, #02; Wed, 18) References: <20190918223741.79215-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:50:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20190918223741.79215-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (Jonathan Tan's message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:37:41 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C444E0D8-DBC6-11E9-8390-B0405B776F7B-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: >> * jt/cache-tree-avoid-lazy-fetch-during-merge (2019-09-09) 1 commit >> - cache-tree: do not lazy-fetch tentative tree >> >> The cache-tree code has been taught to be less aggressive in >> attempting to see if a tree object it computed already exists in >> the repository. >> >> Waiting for a response to an updated log message. > > I've responded here: > > https://public-inbox.org/git/20190910181534.134890-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/ Thanks.