* [PATCH 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-03 19:49 [PATCH 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed William Baker via GitGitGadget
@ 2019-10-03 19:49 ` William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-03 23:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-03 21:08 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Johannes Schindelin
2019-10-09 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 " William Baker via GitGitGadget
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: William Baker via GitGitGadget @ 2019-10-03 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Cc: williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost,
Junio C Hamano, William Baker
From: William Baker <William.Baker@microsoft.com>
While doing some testing with fsmonitor enabled I found
that git commands would segfault after staging and
unstaging an untracked file. Looking at the crash it
appeared that fsmonitor_ewah_callback was attempting to
adjust bits beyond the bounds of the index cache.
Digging into how this could happen it became clear that
the fsmonitor extension must have been written with
more bits than there were entries in the index. The
root cause ended up being that fill_fsmonitor_bitmap was
populating fsmonitor_dirty with bits for all entries in
the index, even those that had been marked for removal.
To solve this problem fill_fsmonitor_bitmap has been
updated to skip entries with the the CE_REMOVE flag set.
With this change the bits written for the fsmonitor
extension will be consistent with the index entries
written by do_write_index. Additionally, BUG checks
have been added to detect if the number of bits in
fsmonitor_dirty should ever exceed the number of
entries in the index again.
Another option that was considered was moving the call
to fill_fsmonitor_bitmap closer to where the index is
written (and where the fsmonitor extension itself is
written). However, that did not work as the
fsmonitor_dirty bitmap must be filled before the index
is split during writing.
Signed-off-by: William Baker <William.Baker@microsoft.com>
---
fsmonitor.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 12 ++++++++++++
t/t7519/fsmonitor-env | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
diff --git a/fsmonitor.c b/fsmonitor.c
index 231e83a94d..fa0b96d84e 100644
--- a/fsmonitor.c
+++ b/fsmonitor.c
@@ -14,8 +14,13 @@ struct trace_key trace_fsmonitor = TRACE_KEY_INIT(FSMONITOR);
static void fsmonitor_ewah_callback(size_t pos, void *is)
{
struct index_state *istate = (struct index_state *)is;
- struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[pos];
+ struct cache_entry *ce;
+
+ if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %"PRIuMAX")",
+ (uintmax_t)pos, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
+ ce = istate->cache[pos];
ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
}
@@ -50,17 +55,24 @@ int read_fsmonitor_extension(struct index_state *istate, const void *data,
}
istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
+
trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor, "read fsmonitor extension successful");
return 0;
}
void fill_fsmonitor_bitmap(struct index_state *istate)
{
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i, skipped = 0;
istate->fsmonitor_dirty = ewah_new();
- for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++)
- if (!(istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_FSMONITOR_VALID))
- ewah_set(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, i);
+ for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
+ if (istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_REMOVE)
+ skipped++;
+ else if (!(istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_FSMONITOR_VALID))
+ ewah_set(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, i - skipped);
+ }
}
void write_fsmonitor_extension(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate)
@@ -71,6 +83,10 @@ void write_fsmonitor_extension(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate)
uint32_t ewah_size = 0;
int fixup = 0;
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
+
put_be32(&hdr_version, INDEX_EXTENSION_VERSION);
strbuf_add(sb, &hdr_version, sizeof(uint32_t));
@@ -236,6 +252,9 @@ void tweak_fsmonitor(struct index_state *istate)
}
/* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
ewah_each_bit(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
/* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor usage */
diff --git a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
index 81a375fa0f..85df54f07c 100755
--- a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
+++ b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
@@ -354,4 +354,16 @@ test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' '
test_cmp expect actual
'
+# Use test files that start with 'z' so that the entries being added
+# and removed appear at the end of the index.
+test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
+ test_commit initial &&
+ removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
+ touch $removed &&
+ git add $removed &&
+ test_config core.fsmonitor "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-env" &&
+ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git restore -S $removed &&
+ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git status
+'
+
test_done
diff --git a/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env b/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..8f1f7ab164
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# An test hook script to integrate with git to test fsmonitor.
+#
+# The hook is passed a version (currently 1) and a time in nanoseconds
+# formatted as a string and outputs to stdout all files that have been
+# modified since the given time. Paths must be relative to the root of
+# the working tree and separated by a single NUL.
+#
+#echo "$0 $*" >&2
+
+if test "$#" -ne 2
+then
+ echo "$0: exactly 2 arguments expected" >&2
+ exit 2
+fi
+
+if test "$1" != 1
+then
+ echo "Unsupported core.fsmonitor hook version." >&2
+ exit 1
+fi
+
+printf '%s\n' $FSMONITOR_LIST
--
gitgitgadget
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-03 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/1] " William Baker via GitGitGadget
@ 2019-10-03 23:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-07 18:10 ` William Baker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2019-10-03 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Baker via GitGitGadget
Cc: git, williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost,
William Baker
"William Baker via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
> ...
> + if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
> + BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %"PRIuMAX")",
> + (uintmax_t)pos, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
This is how we show size_t values without using "%z" that we avoid,
but are "pos" and 'cache_nr" size_t or ssize_t? I thought they are
plain boring unsigned, so shouldn't we use the plain boring "%u"
without casting?
The same comment applies to other uses of uintmax_t cast in this
patch.
> void fill_fsmonitor_bitmap(struct index_state *istate)
> {
> - unsigned int i;
> + unsigned int i, skipped = 0;
> istate->fsmonitor_dirty = ewah_new();
> - for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++)
> - if (!(istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_FSMONITOR_VALID))
> - ewah_set(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, i);
> + for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
> + if (istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_REMOVE)
> + skipped++;
> + else if (!(istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_FSMONITOR_VALID))
> + ewah_set(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, i - skipped);
> + }
> }
Matches the explanation in the proposed log message pretty well.
Good job.
> @@ -354,4 +354,16 @@ test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' '
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> +# Use test files that start with 'z' so that the entries being added
> +# and removed appear at the end of the index.
In other words, future developers are warned against adding entries
to and leaving them in the index that sort later than z100 in new
tests they add before this point. Is the above wording clear enough
to tell them that, I wonder?
> +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
> + test_commit initial &&
> + removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-03 23:36 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2019-10-07 18:10 ` William Baker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: William Baker @ 2019-10-07 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano, William Baker via GitGitGadget
Cc: git, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost, William Baker
On 10/3/19 4:36 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> + if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
>> + BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %"PRIuMAX")",
>> + (uintmax_t)pos, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
>
> This is how we show size_t values without using "%z" that we avoid,
> but are "pos" and 'cache_nr" size_t or ssize_t? I thought they are
> plain boring unsigned, so shouldn't we use the plain boring "%u"
> without casting?
>
> The same comment applies to other uses of uintmax_t cast in this
> patch.
>
Thanks for catching this. I will update these BUGs in the next
patch to avoid casting.
>> +# Use test files that start with 'z' so that the entries being added
>> +# and removed appear at the end of the index.
>
> In other words, future developers are warned against adding entries
> to and leaving them in the index that sort later than z100 in new
> tests they add before this point. Is the above wording clear enough
> to tell them that, I wonder?
>
You're understanding is correct, and I agree this comment could be
clearer. I will fix this up in v2.
Thanks for the feedback!
William
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-03 19:49 [PATCH 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-03 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/1] " William Baker via GitGitGadget
@ 2019-10-03 21:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-10-03 23:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-09 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 " William Baker via GitGitGadget
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2019-10-03 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Baker via GitGitGadget
Cc: git, williamtbakeremail, stolee, jeffhost, Junio C Hamano
Hi all,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, William Baker via GitGitGadget wrote:
> This patch series fixes a segfault that I encountered while testing
> fsmonitor. Under some circumstances, the fsmonitor extension was being
> written with too many bits, and subsequent git commands would segfault when
> trying to apply the bits to the index.
>
> As part of these changes I've added some BUG checks that would have helped
> catch this problem sooner. Special thanks to Dscho for pointing me in the
> right direction and suggesting a test that can reproduce the issue.
>
> Thanks, William
Please note that I was involved with the development of this patch,
reviewed a couple of iterations internally and am implictly okay with
this first public iteration.
Ciao,
Dscho
>
> William Baker (1):
> fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
>
> fsmonitor.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 12 ++++++++++++
> t/t7519/fsmonitor-env | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
>
>
> base-commit: 5fa0f5238b0cd46cfe7f6fa76c3f526ea98148d9
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-372%2Fwilbaker%2Ffix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-372/wilbaker/fix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/372
> --
> gitgitgadget
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-03 21:08 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Johannes Schindelin
@ 2019-10-03 23:17 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2019-10-03 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Schindelin
Cc: William Baker via GitGitGadget, git, williamtbakeremail, stolee,
jeffhost
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, William Baker via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
>> This patch series fixes a segfault that I encountered while testing
>> fsmonitor. Under some circumstances, the fsmonitor extension was being
>> written with too many bits, and subsequent git commands would segfault when
>> trying to apply the bits to the index.
>>
>> As part of these changes I've added some BUG checks that would have helped
>> catch this problem sooner. Special thanks to Dscho for pointing me in the
>> right direction and suggesting a test that can reproduce the issue.
>>
>> Thanks, William
>
> Please note that I was involved with the development of this patch,
> reviewed a couple of iterations internally and am implictly okay with
> this first public iteration.
IOW, "Reviewed-by: dscho". That's good to hear.
THanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-03 19:49 [PATCH 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-03 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/1] " William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-03 21:08 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Johannes Schindelin
@ 2019-10-09 21:00 ` William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-09 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " William Baker via GitGitGadget
` (2 more replies)
2 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: William Baker via GitGitGadget @ 2019-10-09 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Cc: williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost,
Junio C Hamano
This is the second iteration of changes to fix the segfault that I
encountered while testing fsmonitor. This iteration includes the following
updates for feedback I received on v1:
* Use %u instead of %"PRIuMAX" for unsigned ints in BUG format strings
* Updated the new test's comment to be more descriptive
Thanks,
William
William Baker (1):
fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
fsmonitor.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
t/t7519/fsmonitor-env | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
base-commit: 5fa0f5238b0cd46cfe7f6fa76c3f526ea98148d9
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-372%2Fwilbaker%2Ffix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-372/wilbaker/fix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/372
Range-diff vs v1:
1: ce9bf4237e ! 1: 08741d986c fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
+ struct cache_entry *ce;
+
+ if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
-+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %"PRIuMAX")",
-+ (uintmax_t)pos, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %u)",
++ (uintmax_t)pos, istate->cache_nr);
+ ce = istate->cache[pos];
ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
-+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
-+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
+
trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor, "read fsmonitor extension successful");
return 0;
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@
int fixup = 0;
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
-+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
-+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
+
put_be32(&hdr_version, INDEX_EXTENSION_VERSION);
strbuf_add(sb, &hdr_version, sizeof(uint32_t));
@@ -96,8 +96,8 @@
/* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
-+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
-+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
ewah_each_bit(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
/* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor usage */
@@ -109,8 +109,9 @@
test_cmp expect actual
'
-+# Use test files that start with 'z' so that the entries being added
-+# and removed appear at the end of the index.
++# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
++# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
++# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
+test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
+ test_commit initial &&
+ removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
--
gitgitgadget
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-09 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 " William Baker via GitGitGadget
@ 2019-10-09 21:00 ` William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-10 11:07 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-10-10 1:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Junio C Hamano
2019-10-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v3 " William Baker via GitGitGadget
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: William Baker via GitGitGadget @ 2019-10-09 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Cc: williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost,
Junio C Hamano, William Baker
From: William Baker <William.Baker@microsoft.com>
While doing some testing with fsmonitor enabled I found
that git commands would segfault after staging and
unstaging an untracked file. Looking at the crash it
appeared that fsmonitor_ewah_callback was attempting to
adjust bits beyond the bounds of the index cache.
Digging into how this could happen it became clear that
the fsmonitor extension must have been written with
more bits than there were entries in the index. The
root cause ended up being that fill_fsmonitor_bitmap was
populating fsmonitor_dirty with bits for all entries in
the index, even those that had been marked for removal.
To solve this problem fill_fsmonitor_bitmap has been
updated to skip entries with the the CE_REMOVE flag set.
With this change the bits written for the fsmonitor
extension will be consistent with the index entries
written by do_write_index. Additionally, BUG checks
have been added to detect if the number of bits in
fsmonitor_dirty should ever exceed the number of
entries in the index again.
Another option that was considered was moving the call
to fill_fsmonitor_bitmap closer to where the index is
written (and where the fsmonitor extension itself is
written). However, that did not work as the
fsmonitor_dirty bitmap must be filled before the index
is split during writing.
Signed-off-by: William Baker <William.Baker@microsoft.com>
---
fsmonitor.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
t/t7519/fsmonitor-env | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
diff --git a/fsmonitor.c b/fsmonitor.c
index 231e83a94d..7e27839278 100644
--- a/fsmonitor.c
+++ b/fsmonitor.c
@@ -14,8 +14,13 @@ struct trace_key trace_fsmonitor = TRACE_KEY_INIT(FSMONITOR);
static void fsmonitor_ewah_callback(size_t pos, void *is)
{
struct index_state *istate = (struct index_state *)is;
- struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[pos];
+ struct cache_entry *ce;
+
+ if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %u)",
+ (uintmax_t)pos, istate->cache_nr);
+ ce = istate->cache[pos];
ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
}
@@ -50,17 +55,24 @@ int read_fsmonitor_extension(struct index_state *istate, const void *data,
}
istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
+
trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor, "read fsmonitor extension successful");
return 0;
}
void fill_fsmonitor_bitmap(struct index_state *istate)
{
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i, skipped = 0;
istate->fsmonitor_dirty = ewah_new();
- for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++)
- if (!(istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_FSMONITOR_VALID))
- ewah_set(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, i);
+ for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
+ if (istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_REMOVE)
+ skipped++;
+ else if (!(istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_FSMONITOR_VALID))
+ ewah_set(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, i - skipped);
+ }
}
void write_fsmonitor_extension(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate)
@@ -71,6 +83,10 @@ void write_fsmonitor_extension(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate)
uint32_t ewah_size = 0;
int fixup = 0;
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
+
put_be32(&hdr_version, INDEX_EXTENSION_VERSION);
strbuf_add(sb, &hdr_version, sizeof(uint32_t));
@@ -236,6 +252,9 @@ void tweak_fsmonitor(struct index_state *istate)
}
/* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
ewah_each_bit(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
/* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor usage */
diff --git a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
index 81a375fa0f..87042470ab 100755
--- a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
+++ b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
@@ -354,4 +354,17 @@ test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' '
test_cmp expect actual
'
+# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
+# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
+# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
+test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
+ test_commit initial &&
+ removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
+ touch $removed &&
+ git add $removed &&
+ test_config core.fsmonitor "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-env" &&
+ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git restore -S $removed &&
+ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git status
+'
+
test_done
diff --git a/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env b/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..8f1f7ab164
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# An test hook script to integrate with git to test fsmonitor.
+#
+# The hook is passed a version (currently 1) and a time in nanoseconds
+# formatted as a string and outputs to stdout all files that have been
+# modified since the given time. Paths must be relative to the root of
+# the working tree and separated by a single NUL.
+#
+#echo "$0 $*" >&2
+
+if test "$#" -ne 2
+then
+ echo "$0: exactly 2 arguments expected" >&2
+ exit 2
+fi
+
+if test "$1" != 1
+then
+ echo "Unsupported core.fsmonitor hook version." >&2
+ exit 1
+fi
+
+printf '%s\n' $FSMONITOR_LIST
--
gitgitgadget
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-09 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " William Baker via GitGitGadget
@ 2019-10-10 11:07 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-10-10 11:22 ` SZEDER Gábor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: SZEDER Gábor @ 2019-10-10 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Baker via GitGitGadget
Cc: git, williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost,
Junio C Hamano, William Baker
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 02:00:12PM -0700, William Baker via GitGitGadget wrote:
> diff --git a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> index 81a375fa0f..87042470ab 100755
> --- a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> +++ b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> @@ -354,4 +354,17 @@ test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' '
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> +# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
> +# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
> +# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
> +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
> + test_commit initial &&
This is confusing: this is the 29th test case in this script and it
creates an "initial" commit?!
The first "setup" test case has already created an initial commit, so
this should rather be called "second".
OTOH, none of the later commands in this test case seem to have
anything to do with this second commit, and indeed the test case works
even without it (i.e. 'git status' still segfaults without the fix and
then succeeds with the fix applied), so instead of updating its
message perhaps it could simply be removed.
> + removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
> + touch $removed &&
> + git add $removed &&
> + test_config core.fsmonitor "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-env" &&
> + FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git restore -S $removed &&
> + FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git status
> +'
> +
> test_done
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-10 11:07 ` SZEDER Gábor
@ 2019-10-10 11:22 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-10-11 16:38 ` William Baker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: SZEDER Gábor @ 2019-10-10 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Baker via GitGitGadget
Cc: git, williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost,
Junio C Hamano, William Baker
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:07:32PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 02:00:12PM -0700, William Baker via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > diff --git a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> > index 81a375fa0f..87042470ab 100755
> > --- a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> > +++ b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
> > @@ -354,4 +354,17 @@ test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' '
> > test_cmp expect actual
> > '
> >
> > +# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
> > +# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
> > +# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
I just read through Junio's comments on the first version of this
patch, in particular his remarks about this comment.
If this new test case below were run in a dedicated repository, then
this comment wouldn't be necessary, and all my comments below about
that not-really-initial commit would be moot, too.
> > +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
> > + test_commit initial &&
>
> This is confusing: this is the 29th test case in this script and it
> creates an "initial" commit?!
>
> The first "setup" test case has already created an initial commit, so
> this should rather be called "second".
>
> OTOH, none of the later commands in this test case seem to have
> anything to do with this second commit, and indeed the test case works
> even without it (i.e. 'git status' still segfaults without the fix and
> then succeeds with the fix applied), so instead of updating its
> message perhaps it could simply be removed.
>
> > + removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
> > + touch $removed &&
> > + git add $removed &&
> > + test_config core.fsmonitor "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-env" &&
> > + FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git restore -S $removed &&
> > + FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git status
> > +'
> > +
> > test_done
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-10 11:22 ` SZEDER Gábor
@ 2019-10-11 16:38 ` William Baker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: William Baker @ 2019-10-11 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SZEDER Gábor, William Baker via GitGitGadget
Cc: git, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost, Junio C Hamano,
William Baker
On 10/10/19 4:22 AM, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>>> +# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
>>> +# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
>>> +# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
>
> I just read through Junio's comments on the first version of this
> patch, in particular his remarks about this comment.
>
> If this new test case below were run in a dedicated repository, then
> this comment wouldn't be necessary, and all my comments below about
> that not-really-initial commit would be moot, too.
>
Thanks for this suggestion! I will submit a v3 version of the patch
with an update to the test script.
- William
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-09 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 " William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-09 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " William Baker via GitGitGadget
@ 2019-10-10 1:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-10 12:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-10-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v3 " William Baker via GitGitGadget
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2019-10-10 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Baker via GitGitGadget
Cc: git, williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost
"William Baker via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> This is the second iteration of changes to fix the segfault that I
> encountered while testing fsmonitor. This iteration includes the following
> updates for feedback I received on v1:
>
> * Use %u instead of %"PRIuMAX" for unsigned ints in BUG format strings
> * Updated the new test's comment to be more descriptive
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
> William Baker (1):
> fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
Thanks. Dscho, is this still Reviewed-by: you?
>
> fsmonitor.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
> t/t7519/fsmonitor-env | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
>
>
> base-commit: 5fa0f5238b0cd46cfe7f6fa76c3f526ea98148d9
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-372%2Fwilbaker%2Ffix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-372/wilbaker/fix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/372
>
> Range-diff vs v1:
>
> 1: ce9bf4237e ! 1: 08741d986c fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
> @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
> + struct cache_entry *ce;
> +
> + if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
> -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %"PRIuMAX")",
> -+ (uintmax_t)pos, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %u)",
> ++ (uintmax_t)pos, istate->cache_nr);
>
> + ce = istate->cache[pos];
> ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
> @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
> istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
>
> + if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> -+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> ++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> +
> trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor, "read fsmonitor extension successful");
> return 0;
> @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@
> int fixup = 0;
>
> + if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> -+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> ++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> +
> put_be32(&hdr_version, INDEX_EXTENSION_VERSION);
> strbuf_add(sb, &hdr_version, sizeof(uint32_t));
> @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@
>
> /* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
> + if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> -+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> ++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> ewah_each_bit(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
>
> /* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor usage */
> @@ -109,8 +109,9 @@
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> -+# Use test files that start with 'z' so that the entries being added
> -+# and removed appear at the end of the index.
> ++# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
> ++# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
> ++# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
> +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
> + test_commit initial &&
> + removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-10 1:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Junio C Hamano
@ 2019-10-10 12:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2019-10-10 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano
Cc: William Baker via GitGitGadget, git, williamtbakeremail, stolee,
jeffhost
Hi Junio,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "William Baker via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > This is the second iteration of changes to fix the segfault that I
> > encountered while testing fsmonitor. This iteration includes the following
> > updates for feedback I received on v1:
> >
> > * Use %u instead of %"PRIuMAX" for unsigned ints in BUG format strings
> > * Updated the new test's comment to be more descriptive
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > William
> >
> > William Baker (1):
> > fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
>
> Thanks. Dscho, is this still Reviewed-by: you?
Yes!
Thanks,
Dscho
P.S.: I guess we could even go and make this a `Co-Authored-by:` because
the test case is actually by me, at least originally... ;-)
>
> >
> > fsmonitor.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
> > t/t7519/fsmonitor-env | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 5fa0f5238b0cd46cfe7f6fa76c3f526ea98148d9
> > Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-372%2Fwilbaker%2Ffix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
> > Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-372/wilbaker/fix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v2
> > Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/372
> >
> > Range-diff vs v1:
> >
> > 1: ce9bf4237e ! 1: 08741d986c fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
> > @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
> > + struct cache_entry *ce;
> > +
> > + if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
> > -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %"PRIuMAX")",
> > -+ (uintmax_t)pos, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> > ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %u)",
> > ++ (uintmax_t)pos, istate->cache_nr);
> >
> > + ce = istate->cache[pos];
> > ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
> > @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
> > istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
> >
> > + if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> > -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> > -+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> > ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> > ++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> > +
> > trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor, "read fsmonitor extension successful");
> > return 0;
> > @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@
> > int fixup = 0;
> >
> > + if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> > -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> > -+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> > ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> > ++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> > +
> > put_be32(&hdr_version, INDEX_EXTENSION_VERSION);
> > strbuf_add(sb, &hdr_version, sizeof(uint32_t));
> > @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@
> >
> > /* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
> > + if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
> > -+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %"PRIuMAX")",
> > -+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, (uintmax_t)istate->cache_nr);
> > ++ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
> > ++ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
> > ewah_each_bit(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
> >
> > /* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor usage */
> > @@ -109,8 +109,9 @@
> > test_cmp expect actual
> > '
> >
> > -+# Use test files that start with 'z' so that the entries being added
> > -+# and removed appear at the end of the index.
> > ++# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
> > ++# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
> > ++# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
> > +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
> > + test_commit initial &&
> > + removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 0/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-09 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 " William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-09 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-10 1:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Junio C Hamano
@ 2019-10-11 20:11 ` William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " William Baker via GitGitGadget
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: William Baker via GitGitGadget @ 2019-10-11 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Cc: williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost,
Junio C Hamano
This is the third iteration of changes to fix the segfault that I
encountered while testing fsmonitor. This iteration includes the following
updates for feedback I received on v2:
* Update the new test case to use its own dedicated test repository
This latest v3 series has been reviewed by Dscho.
Thanks, William
William Baker (1):
fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
fsmonitor.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++
t/t7519/fsmonitor-env | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
base-commit: 5fa0f5238b0cd46cfe7f6fa76c3f526ea98148d9
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-372%2Fwilbaker%2Ffix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v3
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-372/wilbaker/fix_git_fsmonitor_crash-v3
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/372
Range-diff vs v2:
1: 08741d986c ! 1: 840972e08b fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
@@ -109,17 +109,21 @@
test_cmp expect actual
'
-+# This test covers staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.
-+# Test files with names beginning with 'z' are used under the assumption that
-+# earlier tests do not add/leave index entries that sort below them.
++# Test staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index. Test
++# file names begin with 'z' so that they are sorted to the end of the index.
+test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
-+ test_commit initial &&
-+ removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
-+ touch $removed &&
-+ git add $removed &&
-+ test_config core.fsmonitor "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-env" &&
-+ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git restore -S $removed &&
-+ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git status
++ test_create_repo fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
++ (
++ cd fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
++ test_commit initial &&
++ git update-index --fsmonitor &&
++ removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
++ touch $removed &&
++ git add $removed &&
++ git config core.fsmonitor "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-env" &&
++ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git restore -S $removed &&
++ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git status
++ )
+'
+
test_done
--
gitgitgadget
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v3 " William Baker via GitGitGadget
@ 2019-10-11 20:11 ` William Baker via GitGitGadget
2019-10-12 1:26 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: William Baker via GitGitGadget @ 2019-10-11 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Cc: williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost,
Junio C Hamano, William Baker
From: William Baker <William.Baker@microsoft.com>
While doing some testing with fsmonitor enabled I found
that git commands would segfault after staging and
unstaging an untracked file. Looking at the crash it
appeared that fsmonitor_ewah_callback was attempting to
adjust bits beyond the bounds of the index cache.
Digging into how this could happen it became clear that
the fsmonitor extension must have been written with
more bits than there were entries in the index. The
root cause ended up being that fill_fsmonitor_bitmap was
populating fsmonitor_dirty with bits for all entries in
the index, even those that had been marked for removal.
To solve this problem fill_fsmonitor_bitmap has been
updated to skip entries with the the CE_REMOVE flag set.
With this change the bits written for the fsmonitor
extension will be consistent with the index entries
written by do_write_index. Additionally, BUG checks
have been added to detect if the number of bits in
fsmonitor_dirty should ever exceed the number of
entries in the index again.
Another option that was considered was moving the call
to fill_fsmonitor_bitmap closer to where the index is
written (and where the fsmonitor extension itself is
written). However, that did not work as the
fsmonitor_dirty bitmap must be filled before the index
is split during writing.
Signed-off-by: William Baker <William.Baker@microsoft.com>
---
fsmonitor.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++
t/t7519/fsmonitor-env | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
diff --git a/fsmonitor.c b/fsmonitor.c
index 231e83a94d..7e27839278 100644
--- a/fsmonitor.c
+++ b/fsmonitor.c
@@ -14,8 +14,13 @@ struct trace_key trace_fsmonitor = TRACE_KEY_INIT(FSMONITOR);
static void fsmonitor_ewah_callback(size_t pos, void *is)
{
struct index_state *istate = (struct index_state *)is;
- struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[pos];
+ struct cache_entry *ce;
+
+ if (pos >= istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" >= %u)",
+ (uintmax_t)pos, istate->cache_nr);
+ ce = istate->cache[pos];
ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_FSMONITOR_VALID;
}
@@ -50,17 +55,24 @@ int read_fsmonitor_extension(struct index_state *istate, const void *data,
}
istate->fsmonitor_dirty = fsmonitor_dirty;
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
+
trace_printf_key(&trace_fsmonitor, "read fsmonitor extension successful");
return 0;
}
void fill_fsmonitor_bitmap(struct index_state *istate)
{
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i, skipped = 0;
istate->fsmonitor_dirty = ewah_new();
- for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++)
- if (!(istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_FSMONITOR_VALID))
- ewah_set(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, i);
+ for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
+ if (istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_REMOVE)
+ skipped++;
+ else if (!(istate->cache[i]->ce_flags & CE_FSMONITOR_VALID))
+ ewah_set(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, i - skipped);
+ }
}
void write_fsmonitor_extension(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate)
@@ -71,6 +83,10 @@ void write_fsmonitor_extension(struct strbuf *sb, struct index_state *istate)
uint32_t ewah_size = 0;
int fixup = 0;
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
+
put_be32(&hdr_version, INDEX_EXTENSION_VERSION);
strbuf_add(sb, &hdr_version, sizeof(uint32_t));
@@ -236,6 +252,9 @@ void tweak_fsmonitor(struct index_state *istate)
}
/* Mark all previously saved entries as dirty */
+ if (istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size > istate->cache_nr)
+ BUG("fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (%"PRIuMAX" > %u)",
+ (uintmax_t)istate->fsmonitor_dirty->bit_size, istate->cache_nr);
ewah_each_bit(istate->fsmonitor_dirty, fsmonitor_ewah_callback, istate);
/* Now mark the untracked cache for fsmonitor usage */
diff --git a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
index 81a375fa0f..af3f9951fa 100755
--- a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
+++ b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh
@@ -354,4 +354,21 @@ test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' '
test_cmp expect actual
'
+# Test staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index. Test
+# file names begin with 'z' so that they are sorted to the end of the index.
+test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
+ test_create_repo fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
+ (
+ cd fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
+ test_commit initial &&
+ git update-index --fsmonitor &&
+ removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
+ touch $removed &&
+ git add $removed &&
+ git config core.fsmonitor "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-env" &&
+ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git restore -S $removed &&
+ FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git status
+ )
+'
+
test_done
diff --git a/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env b/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..8f1f7ab164
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# An test hook script to integrate with git to test fsmonitor.
+#
+# The hook is passed a version (currently 1) and a time in nanoseconds
+# formatted as a string and outputs to stdout all files that have been
+# modified since the given time. Paths must be relative to the root of
+# the working tree and separated by a single NUL.
+#
+#echo "$0 $*" >&2
+
+if test "$#" -ne 2
+then
+ echo "$0: exactly 2 arguments expected" >&2
+ exit 2
+fi
+
+if test "$1" != 1
+then
+ echo "Unsupported core.fsmonitor hook version." >&2
+ exit 1
+fi
+
+printf '%s\n' $FSMONITOR_LIST
--
gitgitgadget
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-11 20:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " William Baker via GitGitGadget
@ 2019-10-12 1:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-15 19:07 ` William Baker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2019-10-12 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Baker via GitGitGadget
Cc: git, williamtbakeremail, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost,
William Baker
"William Baker via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> +# Test staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index. Test
> +# file names begin with 'z' so that they are sorted to the end of the index.
Well, the test is now done in a freshly created repository, so the
z* files are the only thing you have in here---technically they are
at the end of the index, but so they are at the beginning, too.
Would it affect the effectiveness of the test that you do not have
any other paths in the working tree or in the index, unlike the test
in the previous rounds that did not use a newly created test
repository?
This is not a rhetorical question, but purely asking. "no, this
still tests what we want to test and shows breakage when the fix to
the code in the patch gets reverted" is perfectly a good answer, but
in that case, is "the end of" the most important trait of the
condition this test is checking? Wouldn't the bug be exposed as
long as we remove sufficiently large number of entries (like
"removing more paths than the paths still in the index at the end"
or something like that)?
Thanks.
> +test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
> + test_create_repo fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
> + (
> + cd fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
> + test_commit initial &&
> + git update-index --fsmonitor &&
> + removed=$(test_seq 1 100 | sed "s/^/z/") &&
> + touch $removed &&
> + git add $removed &&
> + git config core.fsmonitor "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-env" &&
> + FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git restore -S $removed &&
> + FSMONITOR_LIST="$removed" git status
> + )
> +'
> +
> test_done
> diff --git a/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env b/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000000..8f1f7ab164
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t/t7519/fsmonitor-env
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +#
> +# An test hook script to integrate with git to test fsmonitor.
> +#
> +# The hook is passed a version (currently 1) and a time in nanoseconds
> +# formatted as a string and outputs to stdout all files that have been
> +# modified since the given time. Paths must be relative to the root of
> +# the working tree and separated by a single NUL.
> +#
> +#echo "$0 $*" >&2
> +
> +if test "$#" -ne 2
> +then
> + echo "$0: exactly 2 arguments expected" >&2
> + exit 2
> +fi
> +
> +if test "$1" != 1
> +then
> + echo "Unsupported core.fsmonitor hook version." >&2
> + exit 1
> +fi
> +
> +printf '%s\n' $FSMONITOR_LIST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with entries to be removed
2019-10-12 1:26 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2019-10-15 19:07 ` William Baker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: William Baker @ 2019-10-15 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano, William Baker via GitGitGadget
Cc: git, stolee, Johannes.Schindelin, jeffhost, William Baker
On 10/11/19 6:26 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "William Baker via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> +# Test staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index. Test
>> +# file names begin with 'z' so that they are sorted to the end of the index.
>
> Well, the test is now done in a freshly created repository, so the
> z* files are the only thing you have in here---technically they are
> at the end of the index, but so they are at the beginning, too.
>
There is one other file in the index created by 'test_commit', however,
the point still stands that there are almost no other entries in the
index now that the test is using its own repository.
> Would it affect the effectiveness of the test that you do not have
> any other paths in the working tree or in the index, unlike the test
> in the previous rounds that did not use a newly created test
> repository?
The test still validates the scenario that we're concerned about,
namely that the new index that's written has less entries than
the index of the last entry in the old index that's is not flagged
with CE_FSMONITOR_VALID but is flagged for removal (CE_REMOVE).
> This is not a rhetorical question, but purely asking. "no, this
> still tests what we want to test and shows breakage when the fix to
> the code in the patch gets reverted" is perfectly a good answer, but
> in that case, is "the end of" the most important trait of the
> condition this test is checking? Wouldn't the bug be exposed as
> long as we remove sufficiently large number of entries (like
> "removing more paths than the paths still in the index at the end"
> or something like that)?
This is exactly right. The most important trait is that the last
entry flagged with CE_REMOVE does not have CE_FSMONITOR_VALID set
and has an index >= the number of entries in the new index being
written.
I will send out a patch on top of 'wb/fsmonitor-bitmap-fix' with
an update to the comment for this test.
Thanks,
William
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread