From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89381F531 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 19:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726015AbgHGT0U (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:26:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:55272 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725893AbgHGT0U (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:26:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44432EFEA8; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:26:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=XUBq6vnmMvDdsXop73voHa+LeS4=; b=n2FpLB VwbKGBVS7VGwepHytJbvMdJ9vjFP8WBs+5PEiCHg0VCNknD+fOIHwpk/M84DiU9H 431lMi4vvfVDD3vBThVeXkDD50/JQ+0cWupTqYI4o5ZiWC+bkMvsNLxmba5LXt8Z nl4WrMcQryywj81zMaGFkZ/wFJTwmGOXgta4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wT53PAW1perrenOUYg8ltHnU5iSfqZEh IirWDHarHoVJOyeIzYi0YkVS4JXuV2pdiEc6Cgk/FK4Zlw5euMnBnBBI/mc0/mqr PdvXpseB5i9gMT5Kq6ZCPyvStkBP5OlMe5cYzedgVE5q3S7uYCVbWw1pfBWFpISI I175c85nBMo= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DADFEFEA7; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:26:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87185EFEA6; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 15:26:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] refs: fix interleaving hook calls with reference-transaction hook References: <63fb363375b515b903ed1269d10124b727c1d1cc.1596783732.git.ps@pks.im> <20200807075837.GA32344@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200807090412.GA1407904@tanuki.pks.im> <20200807093239.GA1228157@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200807094946.GA1758126@tanuki.pks.im> <20200807182141.GA1307024@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:26:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200807182141.GA1307024@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:21:41 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DC6F79FA-D8E3-11EA-9F72-F0EA2EB3C613-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:49:46AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > >> Yeah, it's also been my take that OS-level overhead is probably going to >> matter more than those access calls, and I argued such back when I >> proposed the hook. So I'm perfectly happy to see this caching mechanism >> go. >> >> Should I re-post a v2 with your patch and my test? > > Sure, that would be fine (to be clear, I'd also be OK with your original > patch, too; it was mostly just a curiosity to me). Let's queue the correctness fix patch as-is. We can and should make the simplification as a separate step, justified with the performance numbers. Thanks.