git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] revision: mark blobs needed for resolve-undo as reachable
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:11:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqczfc5nob.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7cd41846-e6ef-7a24-0426-6031a529360f@github.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:15:03 -0400")

Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> writes:

> On 6/9/2022 7:44 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> +	struct string_list *resolve_undo = istate->resolve_undo;
>> +
>> +	if (!resolve_undo)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	for_each_string_list_item(item, resolve_undo) {
>
> I see this is necessary since for_each_string_list_item() does not
> handle NULL lists.  After attempting to allow it to handle NULL
> lists, I see that the compiler complains about the cases where it
> would _never_ be NULL, so that change appears to be impossible.

Heh, no such deep thought went into this.  I just copied what is
done in builtin/ls-files.c::show_ru_info() that grabs these blobs
and does something interesting and the only difference is this does
something else interesting.

We _could_ refactor these to into "take a callback and iterate over
resolve-undo information" shell plus two callback functions, one to
print them and the other to mark them still reachable, but the
iterator being relatively short, I doubt that it is worth it.

> The patch looks good. I liked the comments for the three phases
> of the test.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-13 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-09 23:44 [PATCH] revision: mark blobs needed for resolve-undo as reachable Junio C Hamano
2022-06-13 15:15 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-06-13 20:11   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-06-14  0:24   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-06-14 14:35     ` Derrick Stolee
2022-06-15  2:02       ` Taylor Blau
2022-06-15  3:48         ` Jeff King
2022-06-15 20:47           ` Taylor Blau
2022-06-15 17:11       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-16 14:10       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-06-14  2:49 ` Taylor Blau
2022-07-11  8:19 ` fsck segfault (was: Re: [PATCH] revision: mark blobs needed for resolve-undo as reachable) SZEDER Gábor
2022-07-11 19:39   ` fsck segfault Junio C Hamano
2022-07-11 23:25 ` [PATCH 2/1] fsck: do not dereference NULL while checking resolve-undo data Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqczfc5nob.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).