From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F3C1F508 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="EqrvWLr6"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231803AbiIUQum (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:50:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51106 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231553AbiIUQuS (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:50:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47372167CD for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D93615190C; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:45:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=W/ksbrdyi35CD8Y/T13Qk2oZgQaZ69Z8gBJuzw A6JW8=; b=EqrvWLr6aN86FK6Cbq/YqMZgdVYT2iNADVuzXXSQyKXqEpKpMOvF5w 5GXV7ljkbeuBrETBwsXTDQWJ8eIYGGVljXHwuS2POekNeEws3mAI9OABnY0xykWv +Uf0ZoOZaNTWwKov30VDpNzUnRwqzE5CDwCXOBlAbx9WkN6dsZScA= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E6F15190B; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:45:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.5.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E0C215190A; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:45:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Han-Wen Nienhuys Cc: Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Han-Wen Nienhuys Subject: Re: [PATCH] refs: unify parse_worktree_ref() and ref_type() References: Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:45:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:53:59 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DD1BE13A-39CC-11ED-9416-307A8E0A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:43 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 5:43 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> then a better approach would be to have a small helper >> >> parse_local_worktree_ref() and make the primary one into something >> >> like >> >>... >> > >> > Thanks, good idea. I'm sending you a v2. >> >> is that "v2" >> or is there another version of it? > > I think so. > >> Hmph, > > Did I do something wrong? Not "wrong" per-se, but I was surprised by the patch that looked quite different from what I expected from your response to the "small helper" suggestion.