From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A761F428 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 21:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=cOpmfwE2; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231190AbjCWVZI (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 17:25:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33246 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229734AbjCWVZG (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 17:25:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E6C13513 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id u20so69198pfk.12 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:25:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679606704; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=evfW38MJLhwPhYQQCVrguUi/Tb7PIk27vW1F/oaii4o=; b=cOpmfwE2klwMNabCGDVm+/ghYgBbDcre5GuHR+sNiKC2eUnavaBO7NUJgo049GbiL3 Hh1Q8P8cmkdi3b0uE39U8vd1stIYM9sb/jqW49vDhk8YgEXrFl+9zySBLw1Qv/FyiA6F fJxQX5Avh2bg18ZBTqrE26AvFpN7tYGhtucBI9COqqe2EV5n2tWHJq8n7oZyUbytm8FI LyYCNTQBEW7dNnAtVyKVs4vzQYnBnhSgHA+NuRbTBumyrwSS3A9Chl01uHYwX+hIg1gK LF6PteJLbiYHowte7lAPiIir8amDEfzEpSXawMCBiAsEkGj+//KHMrl8kdIt7FWNeqyi 3hDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679606704; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=evfW38MJLhwPhYQQCVrguUi/Tb7PIk27vW1F/oaii4o=; b=w25a0ch4Mcd7wbVHOxy44bTgrpmlKBaTRb2zLICu7WlVkpzYvbjC1DoMFAWdWThod9 Vavouq5plM6Q6/qpoEPyo/heio+ezejlBWMTHPP6NrrkcwLteOGOMyjPUyZe5w2NPGby sJkkNlOhmWvXz8RaFD1KfGSsgdqq0vW/C/JFMDRLojWd99Imx2GEFxE1pjLqf7+M/g2l a+vn4NCorYuXXj1PnMOy1kL137dMHgZEAqhmtlVfFjIZJogOFBL3AaYLPteE6MLxISd2 s0vudai8o9krocGcCjleOWsqoFhyETVx+vwcZz76Foax9y5BanB1ypU8ixFzQdZcL3Zj A7uA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9f8Nonntr5OWglQVJVUIpwHCn7SdMy7E+uBspyzhkecBjVX+4Ty lhODR4XUg6mtenYrANZVV+Sw0pUZxbo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350aXr0t5AsJz7ClxSohwV1wqPyKnYkPxZMMWlZKaeTScUGoy2Od1ldn1Ue4+uL9Wq8RkrVBiOw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9629:0:b0:627:fc3b:4cb4 with SMTP id r9-20020aa79629000000b00627fc3b4cb4mr717504pfg.19.1679606704586; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (83.92.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.92.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v5-20020aa78085000000b006254794d5b2sm581798pff.94.2023.03.23.14.25.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Oswald Buddenhagen Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sequencer: actually translate report in do_exec() References: <20230323162234.995485-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <20230323162234.995485-2-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:25:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Oswald Buddenhagen's message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2023 22:20:33 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Oswald Buddenhagen writes: > yeah, but unless this is on someone's shortlist, i don't think it > makes sense to hold up my fix. My point was that your "fix" is not really a "fix" that is worth the code churn. Or did I mis-read your patches? Thanks.