From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D0E1FCA0 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753663AbdC1Q7O (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:59:14 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57275 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752585AbdC1Q7N (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:59:13 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACB0752E3; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:58:56 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=PFu3OUFwps/pL4bLMMCBQGx3KZ0=; b=SmqMMN cqtk8Tz/Jv0Tp5fVkeKatqK6CcEYqP9YU66B7Dy0+ilPSBD3PZTmm8JL0npdBDZI M+JoSAa+gNE/++aZvAim3ZiTt1KpSqiRBV8B5RBJhcM6dJRfTxjnZ6HeR9LPZtbM 52unyk/2XNunsQ3+AZU0t41JdluZ/ibx2d7V4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LTykaB0kx9WPSz6PIo9NTboLqetJL9df xdfTaR+bo8chHyiuttJ0/whUEUVZdJ55tR8X2/4NM9VRcdXJJRGNwOaHeJLsrziU wrO4B54RfD+nL4BzSuO0+bLhuVnkQIWmvluOk42n0NJwSN7+Q/1WPY/wgGU3ZGXn KufUP6PXjng= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930BC752E2; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:58:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0D5A752DF; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:58:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: "brian m. carlson" , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/21] builtin/receive-pack: fix incorrect pointer arithmetic References: <20170326160143.769630-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <20170326160143.769630-7-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <20170328065123.f4uswxxznv3wyqaz@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:58:54 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170328065123.f4uswxxznv3wyqaz@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2017 02:51:23 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D45F3BE4-13D7-11E7-A889-FC50AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > The patch itself is obviously an improvement. It may be worth graduating > separately from the rest of the series. Yup, I will split it out to bc/push-cert-receive-fix that builds directly on an ancient jc/push-cert topic that was merged at v2.2.0-rc0~64. I'll need to drop the duplicate from bc/object-id topic, of course (which hasn't happend). Thanks.