From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F9620899 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 17:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752185AbdHHREi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:04:38 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:55397 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752092AbdHHREh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:04:37 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F3B9A882; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:04:36 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=d8Fq8+C3fBnN MJYbdfxkzfBLU3M=; b=uGStBZGGiHzoqhjccpTe2SLUwCuhIV4Mhze/3mTbP+X+ H1hjgdhvOsy5CPWwGI0LQgG7Rup0ec2JCY03NrnEKnWUg2cH0wtU2cp2LeQq3FYN 6yEnMPmbuykZoHldoKwtT4KHRuvB1fhzIYkuRXfmqBVGoI0FbEVmDHLTOYzE1hQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=T25fXC LFZF+WiS3aH46p4gmvRfIgDqQ9RnJsTEcUDv7W4OdbERrKhEf0ecrAdPpxIkN8Oq 1VifAtfC5hgX3PocChQ1oo/zaW07KMPtDKLGbrYpAmil8dG++xn7TxO3bcOHfQvv EzgW52a+zQ8EP6ZFwUJYkbyREVKX+N3vJyEVg= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAED59A881; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:04:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BAB79A880; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:04:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= Cc: Stefan Beller , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Borowitz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] clean up parsing of maybe_bool References: Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 10:04:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: ("Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren=22's?= message of "Tue, 8 Aug 2017 06:02:06 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A8164FB8-7C5B-11E7-A0B7-FE4B1A68708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Martin =C3=85gren writes: > Thanks, both of you. I could wait a couple of days to see if there are > other things to address, then send a v2 with a more aggressive patch 5? Sounds like a plan. If there aren't anything else, I personally do not mind using what is already on the list without v2, though. That would be less work/churn for me ;-) Thanks.