From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E838208DB for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756288AbdHYROQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:14:16 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:65317 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755630AbdHYROP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:14:15 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2056C9F346; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:14:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=FM8CxxJM+0h/IufGwYqfXXNiYXE=; b=EGh+Ew TrFp1xgtz0q4kl589iW8MmJkHKLp+1Ncggzv0uLct5ORDF02ift1S2s7grxrwcak qHq7joX1fqEervSzBfCFA7U8Q90VUZpGpPFE0gjjguQPJEQ+rHMpfNB+0rkI4qP8 xkQvILbkaK3haMFAgJyS44KzI5aj3B1iQ0o30= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nTIKu7jjdz0IjgZ3u0DW/YxhsEhu5jXx bUIp2+MPM/oDOksc/GIhx7wxHKI40oznbPj3HuolQ57Bl+7C6mu5woBZ7a1QgNxf Xn5ZgAt3CzSL680/FkInD1QTxuNdanaV4MtmVXDArQxIOnwhQagdoAFv848NtUA+ OsyFlydbY50= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184E29F345; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:14:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 775D59F344; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:14:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Stefan Beller Cc: Brandon Williams , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Jeff King , Jonathan Nieder , Jonathan Tan Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] transitioning to protocol v2 References: <20170824225328.8174-1-bmwill@google.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:14:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Beller's message of "Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:07:08 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D1CE384C-89B8-11E7-82DD-FE4B1A68708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stefan Beller writes: > For now I would suggest we put a protocol v2 in place that is > the current protocol + a version number coming through the > poked hole at the beginning; the goal and review of this series > ought to focus on getting the version handshake right... Oh, we are in absolute agreement on that. It would be nice if we can have new tests to demonostrate three combinations working well (i.e. use 'installed git' whose path is given externally on one end of the connection, while the just-built binary sits on the other end, in addition to making sure just-built binary successfully talks with itself).