From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DC6202A2 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 04:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752548AbdJQEFg (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:05:36 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:52778 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751828AbdJQEFf (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:05:35 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F19B1771; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:05:34 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=SCe/LwWWKLm+MuZf32Jt5/CknUo=; b=FdIvN4 2xmADLks66f1tnNlxYYtL3DwwEEBDP52LaxeTUjkxV29p5GCbg2F94pgcH+y2RrN w1goM1ZnZaym7IyGOqSOI/mRiVHqnkRjp7Au5U2XDAuj2MZjoUMSihRGEcMqSPE9 +l1ZS1X/4YIL34uhQte7JobHf0Lw2iNsasq+8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=tcVzEW+y3yoRa2a5EtgkOBpxWvtNdOOB ot47ucRbyRqdSXoZ/QABgXOjJMefeQmIUyiMrhBsKeMfgob0PAnWb3A9HUKFCV87 Wlw1jOaWKA0kfYyI/nX85RPHrS4ghvi8DN90Tz5OUZBbadc7ZxzABEhz4VVBRIvC it9M2YaZsZo= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBA3B1770; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:05:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30CD3B176F; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:05:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Michael J Gruber Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] pre-merge hook References: Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:05:33 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:04:11 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6C9C49E4-B2F0-11E7-A50D-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Michael J Gruber writes: > This series revives an old suggestion of mine to make merge honor > pre-commit hook or a separate pre-merge hook.... This seems to have become an abandoned loose end, so I'll drop the topic from my tree for now; revival of the discussion is _not_ unwelcome (aka "dropping without prejudice").