From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7131F4B4 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 19:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725926AbgIKTel (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:34:41 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:64212 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725905AbgIKTe1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:34:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7252E81E1C; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:34:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ww8NkPMgBV24S9gOwo/MCBDKMTM=; b=TMtsB5 nbxdPaHqE4qx8sp074zwz9oKpEaM7pAs2qk8j1SW3VrFobKbOZw4/CZp+nYXEpzB Us/tdhm+gvJZ4CIMUsK9rqfX4IwCLJfHMw/w/lZloLMFSkm36xCniILv9AGYakIr QYIyznFVPvhNOzJyAyPfeNPLUbnw801QVQs/s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=yYeSrMwMhn3noqaw+/2ylS9G6LNFVg0l B+3XMoPkvwOxRUzU39cBhg6VltKZwVdb8NeXjg/oDJXrYfrYM1eSecI0fb40huMq XcgyrsqI16IvyZc7Evf2sp/OnDGXnqIekI3lJxy+Fi+PFRJ6CehemL+4ICd0bTOu DBDgO4sbGNE= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C3881E1B; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:34:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E98C781E1A; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:34:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Sean Barag via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Sean Barag Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] clone: allow configurable default for -o/--origin References: Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:34:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Sean Barag via GitGitGadget's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:25:23 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CC99E8D8-F465-11EA-854D-2F5D23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Sean Barag via GitGitGadget" writes: > Took another pass at supporting a configurable default for-o/--origin, this > time following Junio's suggestions from a previous approach as much as > possible [1]. Unfortunately, Johannes mentioned that --template can write > new config values that aren't automatically merged without re-calling > git_config. There doesn't appear to be a way around this without rewriting > significant amounts of init and config logic across the codebase. > > While this could have been v2 of the original patchset, it's diverged so > drastically from the original that it likely warrants its own root thread. > If that's not appropriate though, I'd be happy to restructure! I did wonder if this series came from the same motivation while scanning messages in the mailbox and saw no "v2" in the subject, but I am OK either way in a case like this. I DO appreciate this note to explain why it is not marked with "v2".