From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98991F4B4 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390979AbgJLT1J (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:27:09 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64741 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388652AbgJLT1I (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:27:08 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DD08D550; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:27:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=BZXme2JXpiYxCC16xQOJEWw/AB0=; b=rHQKVp dTqRhY8w+aCilmCYtJ+eb9Q5YWlCy1eF/QiE1Mq4FFBRHMAZX3Il8EnxJiQqJaD/ s58i864bwzaE+OSCZibW9AhVUo6GiS1T2Jrnmhf9kE44w7euc2pKoIF0WECcAfqo gKemfsecfZBkv9GKuixrV86biKUda6vlOczSw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Tz77i7TKUX8dNs46WaS+sKsaZcAusKt9 NQg27qRRZNfhid4v+tlPiVhoXrgllGq6E9NkvtWR9VLikUhrNEskBepfiBlom4S9 BGBc5nD12+7fdvC8iQcgFAj3avMp6/nFk28vEizm8xHVqV30wot529O0vhgWhHTg pWrBQr3iAC8= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244D88D54F; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:27:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 881958D54E; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:27:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Philippe Blain , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ci: make the new GitHub workflow logic more defensive References: Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:27:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Sun, 11 Oct 2020 21:27:09 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EAB2D212-0CC0-11EB-8D6F-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" writes: > Phil just reported that the check I added failed miserably > [https://github.com/phil-blain/git/runs/1238660958] in their fork, and the > entire run would be abandoned. That's totally unintended, and was caused by > a different metadata format for older recorded runs. Thanks for a quick response to breakage. > Let's work around this particular issue, and then make the entire check a > lot more robust. > > This patch series is based on js/ci-ghwf-dedup-tests. Will queue.