From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4701F66F for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726852AbgJ2UTw (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:19:52 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:51526 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726662AbgJ2UTw (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:19:52 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA027E95E; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:19:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=IJWVZRWj+f45r3HpATm5CimfeZs=; b=SyL75Y 3rSs1oQ0sJBxRSP0P34AHZb8K2lD2bvhiPG7eM2ckkOTBdIvMGqXeBvZSm4eUC3k h8vPrBIwJt33P8ZYM0H9mWrkh7FPNiAPMjiWCb5cD/lHv8nhbb/i39Fptb3Nra9p t9ry6N4NHn/QBiIOmdxVxr8UFoPwCL6/5wANI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dFz78G8250XI/0OYw5YOFbtvd50oqa1h x9Q45DJ1xX0Dcwot72IIGm/CIz8lzrgwray7ESeq+B4eAd3BHjiMB0nD1VonKSZj cnIv2sdbZb8+PoSt3eoOsgL6Kks4pJl6tnbcSU6EBvjs43eSikUYhZQuFjt0WbJP ezLqYjW5HN4= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D383F7E95D; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:19:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48D637E95C; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:19:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Sunshine Cc: Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget , Git List , Thomas Rast , =?utf-8?Q?Ren?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= Scharfe , Philippe Blain Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] doc: line-range: improve formatting References: <7d3fc0a503b160ea15363a4465af4647bce6a30b.1603889270.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:19:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Eric Sunshine's message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:23:02 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1843DA94-1A24-11EB-9D36-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eric Sunshine writes: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 8:48 AM Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget > wrote: >> Improve the formatting of the description of the line-range option '-L' >> for `git log`, `gitk` and `git blame`: >> >> - Use bold for , and > > My impression is that it is more common in Git documentation for these > placeholders to be formatted with backticks rather than as bold (or, > if not more common currently, at least is trending that way). That's > not to say that my impression is necessarily accurate. I think the impression is fairly in line with the reality. That is not to say that it is a good future to aim for. My personal preference is - use `as-is` for things that must be typed as-is (e.g. `-L`) - use 'emph' for things that are placeholder (e.g. ''').