From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1191F66F for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730751AbgKDRAx (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:00:53 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50949 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729679AbgKDRAx (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:00:53 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFEFA1E83; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:00:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=DMW2QBXOWqaUBKHi+MF2t35+z8s=; b=v1o0da wj6oq42zS8nTK4UKrIe8hsBQE7uH86QYmHl0aR9WqmxHfRpqSyFvXMAXvWRr0+5Q yV+4uOE2ulDAzM7y+AsD0Beloxckb1Xy8086BwMFVigKaVZ3JOBt2UbkWcpnRyje YznPLx67f/77oYuj1Rmsz/1rEPXb5tCAfYD8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wtASaYwghkWq6v87ilfzG5t6ttXp3EJ1 wHHDB2Qc/PmYLv+5DeUnLMHN/Gzcss/KAtL9ht1rG/N80aZORQsuzQGEDSTZpl5a 2I2nZq3Mw1A0nLrmQLdOzV6HJM8JkxsntryV081X/sCQLZOo8KenHMjb+c8w3hx0 LjRRcPM2C84= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333C5A1E82; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:00:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAEF2A1E81; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:00:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, jrnieder@gmail.com, jonathantanmy@google.com, sluongng@gmail.com, =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh , Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Maintenance IV: Platform-specific background maintenance References: <022c5792-e66c-71d8-fbf4-ead9231030ad@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:00:50 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:02:34 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4B6208A2-1EBF-11EB-907E-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > On 11/3/2020 5:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Derrick Stolee writes: >>> I'm hoping that parts 3 and 4 can make it in time for 2.30, >>> so the feature is universally available for all platforms. >>> I realize that's not entirely up to just me. >> ... >> I was wondering if I should propose making these two parts into one, >> so we may be pretty much on the same page. > > I'm happy to have the two topics be merged into one series, but > I'd prefer to only re-roll these three patches during review. > Of course, by keeping them together we have the ability to re- > roll all of the patches, but part-3 has a decent length and has > been stable for a while. > > I defer to what is easiest for you. Two topics, one on top of the other, is fine, as long as I can remember (and you help me by reminding) to keep them together, and the bottom one is reasonably solid that I do not have to do the rebasing myself ;-)