From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B45F1F4B4 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 20:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728712AbhAMUMM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:12:12 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:63656 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728519AbhAMUML (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:12:11 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4755AA665C; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:11:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4HV+qgmmxBSzpwro+CqKwlP1TYc=; b=RbQM61 +F4VmfjKAETKwk3b9D1H4Lu+gBx+XyoHgUI9AUAGVPhssl1tHZAipMVBHZPN8E7+ 3rwLBwmyEA5N/vu4vOfYHncIybEda9ulxyLU/27CnY0maNu10ZCYx90RYJJEnN86 OL3tJy85ZQR88rQu7WuZ1apzrsFF/PbSH41Qc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dSkAbJ946PUWkm+Zl0WfIo93o08bCqnA imHbuJJH6K9Uf/aUlMsTS50nNRWmtLROyS+oB4iluEv6Hk/FnYrqel14fdK6Fi/O z9BEiUGuE0eW3tZQ+8dB4tmdVTpdjmeuPtGM+KEuHxVOiKDyag7S4zoj4oKIL/YE qXviNrj9Onc= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA05A665B; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:11:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6DCEA665A; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:11:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: Taylor Blau , git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] refs: Always pass old object name to reftx hook References: Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:11:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:22:14 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 854ED1DC-55DB-11EB-9A80-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:07:22PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:37:21AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> > Quick ping on this patch. Is there any interest or shall I just drop it? >> >> Apologies for completely dropping this from inbox. I am interested in >> it, and the patch looks good to me. I suspect the reason that this never >> got queued was that nobody reviewed it. > > No worries. > >> Would you consider resubmitting this patch if you are still interested >> in pushing it forwards? > > I can, but does it help to resubmit the same patch? Your response bumped > the thread up to the top anyway. Bumping without resending would often not help people to see the patch at all. For example, already-read-and-old messages are not even shown to me unless I ask my newsreader "I told you to show only the latest 200 messages, and I see this recent 'bump' message, but it responds to a way old message so you need to show me the latest 3000 messages to cover that era in order to see the patch message(s) it bumps." Thanks.