From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D881F5AF for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 02:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230039AbhC2CE2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:04:28 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54817 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229645AbhC2CEU (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:04:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826C4BF952; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:04:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=iiS/OrR09qc9 FUtkyuMj6oKDXO4=; b=uRZllbx3L/IsTL9jMO0gzXadSGVxP6RMCSDjhOQJuNO3 usYzVnLzeCVvFCK2xaDdayB5vHgoyl6cOh8Pzn0q2RwuKv3fxUnqp3+ndUNCsGSB tcKl/0ibNyHaweDTGiSJTIBPhjoD4BuTHZSNDXgJ//kYQMSlSut9h9+45HbDEos= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rBe8yD DZ25kwT5YaQutOqGMgZc0Y+SXkQLHn9YkylUw4uDgX/tQvpsDbjlqDoOru2PahjI rDrrAj/W1UyH3vu/RnUC/c3ortIeJL8G6ZKYT4SFJDT0iliAASXiHLfIYx9g7GnH 4zuE2HtJpodjc05wD3pPlf6H5Oft8SxH8fd6w= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A801BF951; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:04:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3935BF950; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:04:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Ramsay Jones Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Tan , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/19] fsck.h: use designed initializers for FSCK_OPTIONS_{DEFAULT,STRICT} References: <20210317182054.5986-1-avarab@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:04:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Ramsay Jones's message of "Sun, 28 Mar 2021 18:15:19 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1253E3EC-9033-11EB-B7D4-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ramsay Jones writes: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:15:34PM +0200, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 = Bjarmason wrote: >> Refactor the definitions of FSCK_OPTIONS_{DEFAULT,STRICT} to use >> designated initializers. This allows us to omit those fields that >> aren't initialized to zero or NULL. > > s/aren't/are/ Thanks; tweak applied while queuing. > [I apologize in advance - I am using mutt for the first time to reply > to a ML post and I don't know if I should be using L-ist-reply or a > g-roup-reply! :D ] FWIW, on lore (reading via nntp), the message I am responding to looks just fine.