From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343561F852 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351723AbiBKQxm (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:53:42 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:53218 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343720AbiBKQxl (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:53:41 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9D6C21F for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:53:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B569186AB8; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:53:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=jPjMLsVTlJMzhLSH532sgMnMmyfSoyPOjmz7k6 DS90E=; b=V8KgJP9xLjql8c0hyQAOTsUwxI/0O2SOmJAPQZlO1nRWhLIg4lOaCJ K1Ka0pi/rBn7Nvj1TblOzlb4Q8vFX5y4I6c2UKIHo+6i66yAwNTbELYbB1/T6YjW azhCfRhZnDvr5m2bJqvIfNIzUg/S1985/YfpBwPqEv4b1LMDgQBW8= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BE1186AB7; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:53:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.185.212.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 833CE186AB6; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:53:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Shaoxuan Yuan Cc: Taylor Blau , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GSoC] [PATCH 1/1] t0001: replace "test [-d|-f]" with test_path_is_* functions References: <20220121102109.433457-1-shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com> <20220121102109.433457-2-shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:53:36 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Shaoxuan Yuan's message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:56:21 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2844D782-8B5B-11EC-854C-C85A9F429DF0-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Shaoxuan Yuan writes: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 1:23 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> FWIW, I have the posted patch plus the following SQUASH??? fix-up > > I'm not so sure what does "SQUASH???" mean especially the three > question marks, i.e. is it just an incidental text or a commit message > convention? > Is it for the convenience of grepping through the > "git log" outputs (cause I found the commit 50d631c71c right away by > grepping through the "git log" output)? It is primarily to remind me not to merge the branch down to 'next' without dealing with it. > Yeah, I think wrapping it around is a good idea :-) Then will squash it in and merge it down. Thanks.