git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] send-email: prompt-dependent exit codes
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 11:55:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbkfifzry.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230807165850.2335067-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> (Oswald Buddenhagen's message of "Mon, 7 Aug 2023 18:58:50 +0200")

Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> writes:

> From the perspective of a scripted caller, failure to send (some) mails
> is an error even if it was interactively requested, so it should be
> indicated by the exit code.

I am not sure if unconditional change of exit code this late in the
game.  When was the interactive "no, do not send this one" feature
introduced?  The end-users (not necessarily all of them, of course)
have been happily using the command and have appreciated not having
to see non-zero exit code after skipping some messages.  I wonder if
this should be hidden behind an opt-in command line option and possibly
a configuration variable that defaults to "no".

> To make it somewhat specific, the exit code is 10 when only some mails
> were skipped, and 11 if the user quit on the first prompt.

If 10 and 11 were *not* taken out of thin air, but there is a
precedent to use these two values in e-mail related programs, please
share.  It may give us a good justification.

With or without other people's precedents, and with or without
making it conditional, the new behaviour must be documented, if the
command has already a documentation (and it seems that there exists
the Documentation/git-send-email.txt file).  It may be preferrable
to protect the new feature with a test or two added to t9001 but it
obviously depends on how hard you find testing interactive stuff is.

> For interactive calls from the command line, interactive cancellation is
> arguably not really an error, but there the exit code will be more or
> less ignored anyway.

Not necessarily.  Some people prefer to see it and show it in their
command line prompt.

> diff --git a/git-send-email.perl b/git-send-email.perl
> index affbb88509..cd4db84b7f 100755
> --- a/git-send-email.perl
> +++ b/git-send-email.perl
> @@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ sub system_or_die {
>  	die $msg if $msg;
>  }
>  
> +my $sent_files = 0;
> +
> +sub do_exit {
> +	if ($sent_files == @files) {
> +		# All specified messages were sent
> +		exit(0);
> +	} elsif ($sent_files) {
> +		# At least some messages were sent
> +		exit(10);
> +	} else {
> +		# User cancelled on first message already
> +		exit(11);
> +	}
> +}

OK.  As log as we won't start doing 

	while (loop) {
		$file = shift @files;
		send $file;
	}

this will keep working fine, and the logic is very clear to see.

Thanks.  Will queue but expect at least some documentation updates.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-07 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-26  6:16 [PATCH v2] send-email: prompt-dependent exit codes Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-04-27 15:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-02 19:04   ` Felipe Contreras
2023-08-07 16:58   ` [PATCH v3] " Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-07 18:55     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-08-08 10:55       ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-08 16:08         ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-08 19:11           ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-09 17:15           ` [PATCH v4] " Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-09 19:15             ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-10 10:00               ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-10 19:56                 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-11 12:11                   ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-21 17:07                   ` [PATCH v5] " Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-21 17:57                     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-21 18:57                       ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-30  0:46                     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-30 10:06                       ` Oswald Buddenhagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqbkfifzry.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).