From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BAF2070F for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 19:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756711AbcIGT7f (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:59:35 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50264 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877AbcIGT7E (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:59:04 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E353B2AC; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:59:03 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=nidI1xlDhNwt1zeZQ0LxQ0eLKCM=; b=g4gLyV Kjhn8TnOTgHkWdNz2yUXmb64zb9fu2mYyNzIQG09VuIKAgDyAByttU5Bi1drxabh ud/Ed+dO6P4ju0aDMASvhWlmzTKvfcdahbzecjn/mevOLopu8r9dyjmhWJY8o08L l+cXeBs5IXYzxnUg5FgMaW66KGRV5In17ls0A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lNvzBa6qYT6rxUMtrJ2e0qP/WmVfiMAT f/UVq2Wse4bhEEDQEZ5oCWlywO2iATgOYDQVCsOo+u6n6Cvzqvfg0wuBTr5sxPBa 7bWvXHS//Q9dWBkrTmr/ZVVyLN6tb6bAX1DQgT8T4rYPizsasSYRBl7LHfc7Fk5k X8jmbBYXt0E= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433A73B2AB; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:59:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC40F3B2A9; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:59:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Johannes Sixt , Johannes Schindelin , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] t6026-merge-attr: wait for process to release trash directory References: <3fd38b71-26bd-bdb3-fe5c-e7038abf51e0@kdbg.org> <20160906072707.goysliw32xgwmlol@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160907190004.dw3p6fxkdaubwuvu@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:59:00 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160907190004.dw3p6fxkdaubwuvu@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:00:04 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 863C62CA-7535-11E6-BBB0-F7BB12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > I agree that the sleep could be made longer, to make the test less racy. > However, the racy failure mode is that it might pass while testing > nothing (i.e., the sleep ends anyway before the hook returns), so I > don't think it's a high priority. I do not think it is necessary, either. It was just me wondering aloud, nothing more.