From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4DC20D09 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 04:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752373AbdDQERX (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:17:23 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:58561 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751030AbdDQERW (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:17:22 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD808C22C; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:17:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=zweoIroKm4IlAkXNPpw5ZQ7OMXM=; b=earDGn kVR8RX+t6NTIEbIDR62PR8B5UPVzYAphdFZsTMGy1xiwKEmkf3JvU0RbMQYDq0tg sR1lfBOdxDHvSHr9lm/hoNMlFfb5I5TSGS4bwGknzcm+evAnniHaV1Qfk+Cipp7+ 4C7xqRMiyMpdkAcMLW9Xhr4H4JB691sr4yWq0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Nt1FJ4iyOFfwuzzGku8wXQNeYAIcX8iK wMQJzRCgNRtDDtm/9SkyIsGkh85RSEscEPYLSshBFS0hE4uRy2UNdlX1+RpQNSaE wAY0JRiLVao4yKz9NJmK0aXrUiaEiRoe9Yj+Uz4ScxJbui3Dkz3r7UjymSZqr180 lGXFm9AdSuY= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613258C22B; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:17:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3CE68C22A; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:17:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Giuseppe Bilotta Cc: Git ML Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rebase: pass --[no-]signoff option to git am References: <20170415144103.11986-1-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> <20170415144103.11986-4-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:17:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Giuseppe Bilotta's message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:45:54 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C02E4712-2324-11E7-B64D-E680B56B9B0B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Giuseppe Bilotta writes: > Damnit! I just realized that I forgot to amend before the format-patch: > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta > wrote: > >> +signoff! passed to 'git am' > > This should be without the ! or --no-signoff is not accepted. Do I > need to resend or ... ? Resend or send something that can be "git apply"ed, which would reduce the chance of mistakes. Let the maintainer _TYPE_ as little as possible, or typoes will sneak in. Thanks.