From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6343C20373 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 01:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752468AbdJGBYu (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2017 21:24:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51128 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752155AbdJGBYt (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2017 21:24:49 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB944B0391; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 21:24:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cZC+Squ6++kkgJnpfFWeD3F77jg=; b=i82hke Aga0dPmSE7DCECSvUGoVHAn9QCLamyETjPntrLEcg7l+F/WHVM/9BsBFroOjhWuV mQK2HaImq+vUTPacVgKflLCHE0ii/z4IOekeY+reYOxb4dNxiy2RE0u/F7dF/fkL fR1g+UOsYFDQwyrpxW8k9ag8Ymr13GkK9ameA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=K3gcecuMuJ4XaU3a423idaNedpEoPwMK LadxTqvfkAVmzOaIW9eXhxxqy2QxtRYNeYKytsv+n7CmZM5xZrpbKneYbMMIAsHB o0fddvkZzFubCmk3AbFZReyg4A0ml4JA2w3mFpEF6V15HITzVyOOZj3BL/gkCVbV TvG0vU1ZPpg= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C296FB0390; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 21:24:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 372E9B038F; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 21:24:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Heiko Voigt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sbeller@google.com, jrnieder@gmail.com, Jens.Lehmann@web.de, bmwill@google.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] implement fetching of moved submodules References: <20171006222544.GA26642@sandbox> Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 10:24:47 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20171006222544.GA26642@sandbox> (Heiko Voigt's message of "Sat, 7 Oct 2017 00:25:44 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4F081F38-AAFE-11E7-9B77-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Heiko Voigt writes: > So the thing here is: If we want to make sure that we stay backwards > compatible by supporting the setup with gitlinks without configuration. > Then we also should keep tests around that have the plain manual setup > without .gitmodules files. Just something, I think, we should keep in > mind. > > Apart from the tests nothing has been added in this iteration. Since I > finally have a working test now I will continue with reviving the > fallback to paths. Thanks for an update.