From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA041F85D for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732516AbeGKQbw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:31:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:38019 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726609AbeGKQbv (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:31:51 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id 69-v6so3181104wmf.3 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:26:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=toE1v44k3fm0UjpEJduf2+XsnGKyLiPwMYeXiLmha5w=; b=Xk6kb1TNk7oLtUSu8u254DTQX0sHxvNLkLnaC4mSntykSSvLaM0Vssu66x5qVdF3Gy EKRc3zHntWvaXTEgezm24CrSA9d+xS0WVseAmxThCHcYzIickPA5PLJItrJsNczjMvmQ WinqA4iUKWTGqsWiMlmU57LGmhMzJcY4WDUZmHXGwUuej3Z/OvRlU57e1RanhlfUtCfm QxXmk1zEMIrU6niytAMuB1V8YlkLrDIJ063K52V8y5nsRoXm3ZwKzRJrACSFB6AuWGFv pPTCX5dYqR55Xel6CHMB13zBlL7khEt0aLDFjfZeDGcngopcpsUQNRtfa+vI1/8tXuzP Bkvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=toE1v44k3fm0UjpEJduf2+XsnGKyLiPwMYeXiLmha5w=; b=FovR76GdUk8Sl6HdnM+Jl6KAzNXOY2CHQKrYrV+qXscEFOj/JGT7zEFCvmNGMbmUil IBPJUFQgIhT8JWky8QNxlLZFSrAi0xtHu+53YdQ38qkTmmW8kDC1/ouQixpUUYy4+8nP 3Yfel0YU/p8y5skQZY9AqozyTwt9nEua3e1kCzI1jKA+9cpWyKixGuDk4GYKavFmBsVG h6O34ydlk81k/PH/s6MvpFKNlXvnPTILM8Md+6VCBBYaPS0aBromYwO6i0JTcUbRnj4r PLwvVFPKw50+TQmmgQv2LR6j/iOvxEPbpSaUigco5ayWFHUDm6/+19bWHSNJH1YE4eCH pk+w== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1AsHqXeb2hP3DqS/nUyBiQXr66IUukU+QrAYwFoGbH6LDJYsRh ILhwgpDgufgFjvFhyJKZ+fY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpePLTNH/RbJ1szXoJZvI4Q7TEHXhKRe+BmTyq7VtgWwcQpsFAridZklHzJSX2r7YXaHwPrp5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:d78c:: with SMTP id o134-v6mr17202288wmg.115.1531326404904; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (112.68.155.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.155.68.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3-v6sm34513761wrg.47.2018.07.11.09.26.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:26:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Henning Schild , git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine , Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= , Ben Toews , Taylor Blau , "brian m . carlson" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] gpg-interface t: extend the existing GPG tests with GPGSM References: <20180710170901.GH23624@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20180711123824.7e0be91a@md1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> <20180711125109.GC23835@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20180711154019.202e75c5@md1pvb1c.ad001.siemens.net> <20180711143554.GG23835@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:26:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180711143554.GG23835@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:35:54 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: >> While addressing 1 make 2 obvious and worse, addressing 2 is a whole >> different story and should probably be discussed outside of this >> thread. And i would not like to inherit responsibility for 2. In >> fact the whole discussion emphasizes that it was a good idea to make >> GPGSM depend on GPG, because it allows to somewhat reuse existing tests. > > IMHO there is a big difference between inheriting responsibility for > something, and not making it worse. Well said.