From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4C51F45F for ; Wed, 8 May 2019 01:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726406AbfEHB7d (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 21:59:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:56419 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726378AbfEHB7d (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 21:59:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C48146780; Tue, 7 May 2019 21:59:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Ohdqyv1Wguel64gwT+04+cEBKvg=; b=vOKtZl wRG+OLNcVi2cmeNsCeNnHaQUVWikG0ir8kC8Pw3T0dgyjrznCiAu9bcLHnK8fHff OYm8iZGHKIb6/ViuWcSdqyY1XFHOzsHRbM6/2RNGsD1o6XTt012vpe/ZFBSXLqnS KtZhU7gloIY/pzCpXlCp1K+A7DgRl3661zlCg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ejxxLgjiEXMpZHuPuJzhndEagAVersDF PMxxSxN5FUefuKGHOPk4tF5g07HQH9VM5TGHFBKutgy+Us37VHm3dzQKp4vriKfQ MQOMZKpXRa9G9zkMQ50Ob2Ugbd2xMd+pno34QvpNZSoDYEgsvtdnF49zaCGhwlfk d8iC5A+guU0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888AD14677F; Tue, 7 May 2019 21:59:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.255.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2D8F14677E; Tue, 7 May 2019 21:59:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] perf-lib.sh: fix 0baf78e7bc regression, refactor & fix bugs References: <20190506232309.28538-1-avarab@gmail.com> <20190507105434.9600-1-avarab@gmail.com> <20190507213612.GB19955@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 10:59:30 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20190507213612.GB19955@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 7 May 2019 17:36:12 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EBC7CB18-7134-11E9-AF10-E828E74BB12D-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > I think this is reasonable, especially with the feature in patch 6 to > tell the caller they're doing it wrong, instead of just silently > producing nonsense results. > > Junio, if you haven't been following closely, this can replace my patch > from jk/perf-installed-fix. I did not pick up v2 or earlier as it wasn't clear what the resolution would be, but I agree that this round looks sensible. Thanks for the hint; very very much appreciated.