git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Carlo Arenas <carenas@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
	Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] transport-helper: enforce atomic in push_refs_with_push
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:12:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa7dbz5h7.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190718152234.GI20404@szeder.dev> ("SZEDER Gábor"'s message of "Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:22:34 +0200")

SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> writes:

> With that patch issues like this could be caught earlier, while they
> are only in 'pu' but not yet in 'next'.  But do we really want to do
> that, is that the right tradeoff?

I am sort of in favor of having at least one build with an older
compiler without "-std=c99", like the set-up you are proposing.
I got an impression from an earlier message that Jonathan's
preference is the opposite.  I'd prefer to hear opinions from
others, too.

The main reason why we accept other new features like trailing comma
in enum def and designated initializers while rejecting for loop
init is because there apparently are those who build Git with
compilers that accept & reject these combinations of features and
who care enough to report compilation failure from their build.  And
apparently gcc4.8 can serve as a representative "old" compiler,
so...

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-18 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-02  0:53 [PATCH] transport-helper: enforce atomic in push_refs_with_push Emily Shaffer
2019-07-02 13:51 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-07-02 18:27   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-03 18:56   ` Emily Shaffer
2019-07-03 19:01     ` Emily Shaffer
2019-07-03 19:41     ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-07-03 20:57       ` Emily Shaffer
2019-07-04  8:29         ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-07-09 20:23           ` Emily Shaffer
2019-07-02 19:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-02 20:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-03  0:09   ` Emily Shaffer
2019-07-02 21:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-03  0:08   ` Emily Shaffer
2019-07-03  9:10   ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-07-03 18:13     ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-03 18:58       ` Emily Shaffer
2019-07-09 21:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Emily Shaffer
2019-07-10 17:44   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-10 17:53     ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-11 21:14       ` Emily Shaffer
2019-07-11 20:57     ` Emily Shaffer
2019-07-11 21:13       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-11 21:19   ` [PATCH v3] " Emily Shaffer
2019-07-12 16:25     ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-16  7:10   ` [PATCH v2] " Carlo Arenas
2019-07-16 16:53     ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-16 17:21       ` [RFC/PATCH] CodingGuidelines: spell out post-C89 rules Junio C Hamano
2019-07-17  0:55         ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-07-17 16:03           ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-19  1:15             ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-07-17  1:09         ` Bryan Turner
2019-07-17 16:05           ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-16 18:00       ` [PATCH v2] transport-helper: enforce atomic in push_refs_with_push Carlo Arenas
2019-07-16 20:28       ` [PATCH] transport-helper: avoid var decl in for () loop control Junio C Hamano
2019-07-17  0:42         ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-07-18 15:22       ` [PATCH v2] transport-helper: enforce atomic in push_refs_with_push SZEDER Gábor
2019-07-18 16:12         ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-07-18 23:46           ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-07-18 16:29         ` Eric Sunshine
2019-07-19  1:31         ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-07-19  4:49           ` Carlo Arenas
2019-07-19 19:15             ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-27  8:43         ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-07-27 16:11           ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqa7dbz5h7.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=carenas@gmail.com \
    --cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).