From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ben Keene via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ben Keene <seraphire@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] git-p4: [usability] RCS Keyword failure should suggest help
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:22:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa781t9zf.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d608f529a0e01e99c97e895ab483000da068a7ac.1575901009.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Ben Keene via GitGitGadget's message of "Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:16:48 +0000")
"Ben Keene via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> From: Ben Keene <seraphire@gmail.com>
>
> When applying a commit fails because of RCS keywords, Git
> will fail the P4 submit. It would help the user if Git suggested that
> the user set git-p4.attemptRCSCleanup to true.
>
> Change the applyCommit() method that when applying a commit fails
> becasue of the P4 RCS Keywords, the user should consider setting
s/becasue/because/
> git-p4.attemptRCSCleanup to true.
The above explains the new "else:" clause really well. The
original's logic was to
- tryPatchCmd to apply a commit, which might fail,
- when the above fails, only if attemptrcscleanup is set, munge
the lines with rcs keywords and rerun tryPatchCmd
but your new "else:" gives a suggestion to use the (experimental?)
attemptRCSCleanup feature.
However, it does not explain the change to the "if :" clause. I can
see that patchRCSKeywords() method does want to raise an exception,
and it is a good idea to prepare for the case and clean up the mess
it may create. At least that deserves a mention in the proposed log
message---I actually think that the new try/except is an equally
important improvement that deserves to be a separate patch.
> Signed-off-by: Ben Keene <seraphire@gmail.com>
> ---
> git-p4.py | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-p4.py b/git-p4.py
> index 0fa562fac9..856fe82079 100755
> --- a/git-p4.py
> +++ b/git-p4.py
> @@ -1950,8 +1950,23 @@ def applyCommit(self, id):
> # disable the read-only bit on windows.
> if self.isWindows and file not in editedFiles:
> os.chmod(file, stat.S_IWRITE)
> - self.patchRCSKeywords(file, kwfiles[file])
> - fixed_rcs_keywords = True
> +
> + try:
> + self.patchRCSKeywords(file, kwfiles[file])
> + fixed_rcs_keywords = True
> + except:
> + # We are throwing an exception, undo all open edits
> + for f in editedFiles:
> + p4_revert(f)
> + raise
> + else:
> + # They do not have attemptRCSCleanup set, this might be the fail point
> + # Check to see if the file has RCS keywords and suggest setting the property.
> + for file in editedFiles | filesToDelete:
> + if p4_keywords_regexp_for_file(file) != None:
> + print("At least one file in this commit has RCS Keywords that may be causing problems. ")
> + print("Consider:\ngit config git-p4.attemptRCSCleanup true")
> + break
>
> if fixed_rcs_keywords:
> print("Retrying the patch with RCS keywords cleaned up")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-09 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 14:16 [PATCH 0/3] git-p4: Usability enhancements Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] git-p4: [usability] yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-09 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-10 14:26 ` Ben Keene
2019-12-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] git-p4: [usability] RCS Keyword failure should suggest help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-09 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-12-09 14:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] git-p4: [usability] Show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-09 22:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-09 22:06 ` [PATCH 0/3] git-p4: Usability enhancements Junio C Hamano
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] git-p4: yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-11 11:52 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-11 11:59 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] git-p4: show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] git-p4: wrap patchRCSKeywords test to revert changes on failure Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-10 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] git-p4: failure because of RCS keywords should show help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-11 11:29 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-11 9:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] git-p4: Usability enhancements Luke Diamand
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 " Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] git-p4: yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 1:45 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-13 13:42 ` Ben Keene
2019-12-13 19:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-15 20:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2019-12-16 17:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-16 19:11 ` Ben Keene
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] git-p4: show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] git-p4: wrap patchRCSKeywords test to revert changes on failure Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-12 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] git-p4: failure because of RCS keywords should show help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] git-p4: Usability enhancements Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] git-p4: yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 22:54 ` Denton Liu
2019-12-16 13:53 ` Ben Keene
2019-12-13 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] git-p4: show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] git-p4: wrap patchRCSKeywords test to revert changes on failure Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-13 13:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] git-p4: failure because of RCS keywords should show help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] git-p4: Usability enhancements Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] git-p4: yes/no prompts should sanitize user text Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] git-p4: show detailed help when parsing options fail Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] git-p4: wrap patchRCSKeywords test to revert changes on failure Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 14:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] git-p4: failure because of RCS keywords should show help Ben Keene via GitGitGadget
2019-12-16 20:39 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] git-p4: Usability enhancements Junio C Hamano
2019-12-21 10:19 ` Luke Diamand
2019-12-25 19:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-02 13:50 ` Ben Keene
2020-01-02 21:44 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa781t9zf.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=seraphire@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).