From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9FD1F4B4 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436641AbhALTvi (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:51:38 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:61926 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2436627AbhALTvi (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:51:38 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DD5FFAA9; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:50:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=t9cc4KVyoZrL6TYrj3jTbDcXKc0=; b=Qh1MFo mPeiKgBdcD2JdIfg/aJ/AS3TiM3GGi2BS14vISdsGvF5gXzRh+0Ow1ZAFEH0Hgh/ djMsz+VB+eDP0PWVh7eG4A59iEvYrXNZAEKi+R/xdVHr00VEYjjgBs+gPVVdNSCz R+m8vVZsAnDDUZY/L1mlQZU9sL938EOaEclXQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ha187k02GxkBGn77QCqPbj5jirFy3ezh WgwjG6AhPV+zG2eSpvnJgnK7itkb/X5HshuE2Xy5zey5MSDqp46Po5blvqeX9PA4 KVQvGxYUGC/gpI7001X60KM1kZFlWIv7R3wLhmQNFsO8SkzY43ZthdN7K5VcTm5H Xio7qS2W71E= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72556FFAA8; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:50:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAD13FFAA5; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:50:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= , SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] [RFH] Introduce support for GETTEXT_POISON=rot13 References: Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:50:52 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:34:38 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7AC93DD2-550F-11EB-8816-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Likewise, I'm not sure that one can reliably rot13 an output for > test_i18ncmp. It could contain mixed translated and untranslated bits > from different messages. As long as ... marking can be trusted (and it cannot be, but if we declare it is OK to punt, then by definition we can), I think the messages can be compared. > So I dunno. You did find two spots where translations could be used. > But if nobody actually saw them to care that they got translated, were > they important? I may be a bit biased as somebody who would not use the > translations in the first place, of course. I viewed the series with interest, mostly (i.e. 80%+) for its "fun value"; I tend to agree with you that I doubt its usefulness.