From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49291F5AF for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230362AbhC2Vgu (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:36:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:56530 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231131AbhC2VgZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:36:25 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F18A125831; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:36:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=inV/dpFL4L9dfEat7klDnDfOyiM=; b=uvHFyQ c7NmHFrDFz6CgaYtc4dS+RT78RPrAgmtzmmic1tn7cd/VI+KZDUpPoUVyEfuKKfz A8d8SBEjKdgEtuZfEUEsCnJRHdDY6dsst8/PQlwm7tOi12/iohukNViD/OY8Ns30 vW5m7ArGM8evODRLUUIgjPSgslTuOAg2HwV20= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ATEc3EUHVP0A2ElYCD99PtPGKrFkwWsE 56NthRmHp4ugnpW8ohRbg7STCBam5V68ZPcm0SontyYaaZJZsFW4cC8SCxeuxD6q 6ijvGzkMA0WMYOVILexiL9Np231C1wlG/XuQZwjklOY4fc5Xzjcps97PtZwhI+kn B7ChtJJN0wA= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375E5125830; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:36:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72FB912582E; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:36:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Li Linchao via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , dscho , Jonathan Tan , Li Linchao Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] builtin/clone.c: add --reject-shallow option References: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:36:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Li Linchao via GitGitGadget's message of "Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:19:04 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CE61C2CC-90D6-11EB-BF18-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Li Linchao via GitGitGadget" writes: > Changes since v6: > > * use _() for warning/die statement This round tweaks a few test titles and drops warning() that was given in v7 when the feature is not in use. Comments from other reviewers who are more familiar with the transport layer than I am? As far as I see, this version is done cleanly enough to call it ready for 'next'. Thanks.