From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA761F4B4 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229734AbhCaVPN (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:15:13 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60029 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229812AbhCaVOx (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:14:53 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7ACB8E7E; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:14:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=hsIM2ph6ELKzqDuEwO1/Ywn2GSQ=; b=rGp0fR HyLtyey1MIKTJkIpydIP18osEK/JKtOMjUbR5Z47uBCuAnKGLKHCPy7J69bp3e58 Ps3WCFmWiGo7Fm5Yp4W6RsFz+WFAhto5oRH/jmvoZ7N1srQCTOSW5BNlAZUKYHDZ wvOqz1/rR5XfarQpRmgd8/Eig4HWvwUo/10Co= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=s55tBqdNd9wfBLrTKpKt0ezektQzHWT1 3sLiJ27li7D2WkcQb0byBaM5nHYQa/VpdZV5tbX2dNvBCCQZViicOwbKeQLaUlbk 0rjYtEyWaoUujezP0WkcSMCXyikba3cct3Amg34xTZNowiQntr0ccs0ZwNVeJFRV e85g9Xw62l4= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FF9B8E7D; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:14:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D0B2B8E7C; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:14:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Georgios Kontaxis via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , "brian m. carlson" , Georgios Kontaxis Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] gitweb: redacted e-mail addresses feature. References: Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:14:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:00:17 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 22377442-9266-11EB-89BA-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Will queue as-is. Input from those who are more adept at Perl > and/or interested in helping polish gitweb are still welcome, but at > my level of interest on the topic, this version looks as good as it > gets ;-) Oh by the way, as nobody commented on the title, I'd have to X-<. I'll retitle it to gitweb: add "e-mail privacy" feature to redact e-mail addresses while queuing. Thanks.