From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902DC1F5AE for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229582AbhD3AHz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:07:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54685 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229519AbhD3AHz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:07:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB5AD733D; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:07:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=oPOHMB7Mx1DJ HLG1EMrDPHPC7cIlUcx0vywvMGMePSc=; b=NGgciaOOOBV0BrRr5UtpVW8d9Ki2 3DtqmODnXFmis2fMBUq1ppX6SyvQJzpFY0qV0e6ltDGix492NTUXtFOxiXnPck3a f63/eLeS2YVlCVam9JIbcX0is+saCVxPF0zy89/z20RrM49IlknYwJkPAjqf6t+B ohWFukpR/V4elWw= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CF0D733C; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:07:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D572D733A; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:07:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Derrick Stolee , git@vger.kernel.org, Taylor Blau , Patrick Steinhardt Subject: Re: Nesting topics within other threads References: <87k0omzv3h.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <1ecb3727-106f-3d04-976a-36aa03a61caf@gmail.com> <8735v9z32l.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:07:04 +0900 In-Reply-To: <8735v9z32l.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:14:52 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FFCB73B0-A947-11EB-96D7-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > In RFC 822 terms. Are you talking about the In-Reply-To[1] or > References[2] headers, or both/neither? Neither (I think Peff explained why it is a good idea to defer to verbal communication not to confuse tools better than I could).