From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: My patches Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:54:34 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20131012072450.GA21165@nysa> <525c64ebe2390_197a905e84c@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 17 21:54:41 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VWtea-0003Ig-MQ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:54:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762571Ab3JQTyi (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:54:38 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:60869 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762564Ab3JQTyh (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:54:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1014B3CB; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:54:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=0B2lbdNbWPOWvPrVc3vtrsoYB8M=; b=VqFN380F9E6UOqnzWNOb gtadIPvYCbIlwcsQZ0jdQnb+ISNJrNkpwa0IsSTpXhzpvsiY903ZF5cvzRkti7UU EVqNlbYVguVHDT4FHiEiogTxoI+GnN/5N1G08S7/jQVWvohjbyen0wv0U7I8u14j n1hmRLgDW3ZEvKOOiPODhEY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=BGCb3PjlHnboe18xtUKuS1gzj2MmVh+vNF224ziRbaLVyf MFfotGRf1iorgCNYPeLwwYwxtUJ4mNIlwJLCvNh9wZ7J7T+fkLpZuCGdZFLx+SUG 7fM88qgp3DALnVTyEaaryMnMlAyeHE78SHXgl/Ya9MMORGlrdEtq+azP8+39k= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E00B4B3CA; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D52D04B3C2; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:54:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F2F87FC2-3765-11E3-A70B-8F264F2CC097-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Such a review comment and the discussion that follows it after a >> patch is posted is an essential part of the collaborative >> development process in this community and it has helped the quality >> of our end product. We unfortunately saw time and again that the >> process rarely works when the discussion involves your patches. > > No, you did not. What you saw was a person that unlike a trained dog, argued > against you. And apparently your definition of a good discussion is one in > which the other person just does what you say, and doesn't argue back. That is so untrue that it is not even funny. If the ultimate goal of your whining is to spread misinformation to make you look like a victim, you are not worth talking to. Contributors often make sensible counter-arguments and/or explain the rationale better than they did in their original messages, and then receive a "Thanks for a dose of sanity" (or an equivalent phrased in different ways).