From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E581F404 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 20:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752199AbeC2Upk (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:45:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:41347 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751893AbeC2Upi (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:45:38 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f193.google.com with SMTP id f14so6484142wre.8 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:45:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=2Vnz6ZLg9qcvL5MyNQCIj1g4gjuL9nsgLmNpHeuH7vY=; b=MB+PLptm5q2Dd0Hk5z/lKUyxvnG0VNXaqd0HgwA/2nK5julpw4H1bbLoysKH0ILg+z Ez+l0gGaWq+bi9pwDXNn7hpZ9jTlWocCQ9mcAHwFrlzQp2ygaCwLY5n7x7xNnOb82n2t PeAtuDRPeFCFzcwRE/A7PzvjdG1GKqZT70Zvc4omDPCztR26dC92x+uVGlNtRChLwg9c R7msK5o2lSMKdJiAIASY0xsGFwlflLmJ8WmTNg5A4PiLAtuDSH2IZ5ebLFBYsAlpn6mQ oYP2+ARaC7hwTtbEIGLzZY/ScT78dkM7W77EUGJMNvJ9CWINNNDclerSPOXcif34M63E keMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=2Vnz6ZLg9qcvL5MyNQCIj1g4gjuL9nsgLmNpHeuH7vY=; b=jTSj5PPVicSJKrb/+XzSDoEBcIbkP2jzriOOX/EFeWPYwXkDOwi1Wysa12nKDhGO6y zPnKaKS0Xjffn0A2+Rxg0vRGo0fe3+rngNCCaWKDb9qlo9XpWFD8yRxi/NtVKTcWytXz jBK3i3AbMQYL/Tk/JIsa41Bbp8nz3pc21/VUWieG3xG5ju9mOV1GLUwMc/PCdBRWRsbR cRQ1X1X76s10l+xlUUL0jda4J7JCOdA76VST/mW+Ho+MJBRw4CWH12DNPNtXpjlPCxxu w+eSQotpcMANnUo2z5FC2GiJC8age3Cl3EvEGb4Ue52y67DadKts1r6/YZeZ2U1B/YEt yeQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Fwj+NSJ1DT178qIKC0eWFSMDP7U4gfHlbFl9PUxetKNrlW6PCq PMv79fv4SkcEFKsd7308DGI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+BKSh2LStnrGuObyad9RICPWyn1TnuwBwVvxJdH9iVSNDGHpH1JxCDRB/+GrhCBxbP3juhxw== X-Received: by 10.223.177.145 with SMTP id q17mr7664413wra.26.1522356337304; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (112.68.155.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.155.68.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o23sm13751421wrf.93.2018.03.29.13.45.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:45:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Rast , Phil Haack , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Stefan Beller , Jason Frey , Philip Oakley Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] t1300: remove unreasonable expectation from TODO References: <5801f7529465b7dbdfbe3c105e2a8212c253ba0d.1522336130.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> <20180329195218.GE2939@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:45:35 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180329195218.GE2939@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:52:18 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > An obvious question is whether we should preserve the original > unrealistic parts by splitting it: the realistic parts into one > expect_failure (that we'd switch to expect_success by the end of this > series), and then an unrealistic one to serve as a documentation of the > ideal, with a comment explaining why it's unrealistic. > > I doubt the "unrealistic" half would be serving much purpose though, so > I'm OK to see it get eliminated here. Likewise. The series looks good so far.