From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F781F4B4 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 20:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726908AbhAJUTS (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:19:18 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:58851 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726394AbhAJUTR (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:19:17 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7ECA9452; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:18:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=v88PEpGTWGmyJEhx5Mf/WnI2iA8=; b=TECGOM wr++WdVV4aMng54b5yLJugkxFb9ZjXXOcDBiXa8LeoLWrm1TqsCnNNkOnDe7Fcb0 YbyBu84dqPG/1sCSmzOfJLFFkizmh3kIk5ul2vfydVCEZDg9S/C8uNNldfct3unu RQI4P4nFppr+5EXEusYgkOjBdonILgUH6oBp4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=evEvywwBLafRAiBagF6SJ4F5DX7WOBlm kMz/lmixl74OJSwiTPuKVKYEvhoTcVyLF5FpxyAGkOxb3qOhJG7flZszm1sXJAfW 77S0brtkwBvZkCehsqpyUzHH30t6K5ZSCoN/xFHnokbNFit4/AdX/+47kP1MyyK3 HJiIC2V1Grc= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128EFA9451; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:18:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8894CA9450; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:18:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Taylor Blau , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Nika Layzell via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Nika Layzell Subject: Re: Cc'ing the Git maintainer on GitGitGadget contributions, was Re: [PATCH 0/1] add--interactive: skip index refresh in reset patch mode References: <87wnwordzh.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:18:33 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:21:38 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 03DEDDF6-5381-11EB-A422-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi Taylor, > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Taylor Blau wrote: > ... >> I think that this could be reasonably addressed. When someone opens a PR >> (but before the hit /submit), GGG could say: >> >> Your change touches these files, and so suggested reviewers include >> X, Y, Z. When you believe your submission is in its last round, >> please also include the maintainer, M. > > That is an option. As Taylor created the above suggestion as a counter-proposal, I can see that I apparently did not express what I meant very well, when I said: Is there a point in the end-user experience flow, starting at the time when they push their proposed change to their repository, throw a pull request at GitHub, say "/submit", and then GGG finally sends out a patch e-mail, where the GGG machinery can inspect the change and give the user (preferrably before the user says /submit) a hint that says "you may want to add Cc: to these people in such and such case, and if you think the situation falls into these cases, tell me so by saying /submit-with-suggested-cc instead of the usual /submit"? What Taylor suggested, and what you seem to be agreeing to, is exactly what I had in mind when I wrote the above in my message. So perhaps we three are on the same page from the beginning ;-) Looking forward to see a new feature that helps contributors to more easily ask help from appropriate people. Thanks.