From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849701F54E for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="VBWB3YBj"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236905AbiGMQ34 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:29:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37422 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235537AbiGMQ3z (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:29:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE69C20F44 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F031B4A66; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:29:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=XtvwKNZiAw0zmGx/MCn6hkSdxYv1YChg4vLScT i7iBM=; b=VBWB3YBj/wdYzBqrQmC8IF9df66h73pzP5bEDLEXeeg7SjwgRzuP7o B6KlO1VQnEddMozbuDJsHQm69PDPRPu8SLEcXPLVsO2UAQaHk+xmI3gpkYVxMwLa d0foAUX4lkqmBZER8KAOrkwiAEA8DYSck8mQ4Dbsxao4nfxm3hnY4= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809DE1B4A65; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:29:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.92.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32F261B4A64; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:29:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Glen Choo Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gc/bare-repo-discovery (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2022, #03; Mon, 11)) References: Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:29:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Glen Choo's message of "Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:19:55 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 03B53304-02C9-11ED-AC7F-C85A9F429DF0-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Glen Choo writes: > I also noted your distaste for the `discovery.*` namespace (fair > enough). To avoid a reroll-of-the-reroll, I was hoping that we could > agree on something on-list (thread here [1]) before I send out the next > version. I found your idea of adding this new one in the safe.* hierarchy quite reasonable. "safe.discoveredBareRepository = yes / no" may be quote a mouthful, but I do not think I can think of anything better.