From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Promoting Git developers Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:16:25 -0700 Message-ID: References: <54FDA6B5.8050505@drmicha.warpmail.net> <003001d05f71$81845160$848cf420$@nexbridge.com> <87a8zdguxp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Stefan Beller , David Kastrup , "Randall S. Becker" , Michael J Gruber , git , Jeff King , Scott Chacon , Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen To: Christian Couder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 17 21:16:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXxui-000474-Ml for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:16:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754154AbbCQUQ2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:16:28 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:63613 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753211AbbCQUQ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:16:27 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B51406EE; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:16:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TIGodHn5NJA4CdG40nMHsw6uvpU=; b=HLs4vi KesK34Ph0emDPai6sZTrfWR5pqDDdnSJz5iWV4DB5+bAtRkye3R+2BcCKgWUyt7U hGMmt+HMdND/QY9cYH6LbGgZ9U9FTLvklqblBcjcEvAs4uPeEo5nU0GcU3A7JxOQ +6KOA+KxF8Z7NcwIlFI2ol+aEjxGg4Y4OK7Lg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=vBx68budx3nY2o0pfrIIbXJdL66YIbZm Woxpj22gSs2rwbKCMBzGeMFc6FHMn/ahze7hzBsb7HxRae7lgJjNlepC4xXzvapk sbJ2yTA5EhQ8MHLYJDr69MeNpXEyg875jnP+SUEzrL1WPAiZGG5LyKJ4y2GEfapV qanqSsLr6rs= Received: from pb-smtp1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AF7406EC; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:16:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1CCD406EA; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:16:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Christian Couder's message of "Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:08:57 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7D7540A0-CCE2-11E4-A06A-A2259F42C9D4-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Christian Couder writes: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Stefan Beller wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:20 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >>> "Git Annotate"? >> >> "Git Praise" as opposed to blame? >> "Git Who" as a pun on the subcommand structure which doesn't always >> follows grammar? > > Yeah these suggestions above are nice, thanks for them, but "Git Rev News" > also look a bit like "git rev-list" and "git rev-parse" which are plumbing Git > commands, so it gives a somewhat "hardcore" look to the news letter which > I like. Call that "Git Rev List" then to be more direct? I myself liked the "Review" (spelled in full word) as its non-nerdy sound, as a suitable name for a publication that bridges between hard-core developers and slightly-more-serious-than-casual observers, but its not my call (and as I often say, I am not good at naming things) ;-).