git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jens.Lehmann@web.de, dborowitz@google.com,
	jacob.keller@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] submodule: Include check for objects when fetching
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:18:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7fhw49ly.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqk2lw4a6p.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:06:22 -0800")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>>
>>> Junio wrote:
>>>> To be complete, the rev-list command line should also run with
>>>> "--objects"; after all, a commit walker fetch may have downloaded
>>>> commit chain completely but haven't fetched necessary trees and
>>>> blobs when it was killed, and "rev-list $sha1 --not --all" would not
>>>> catch such a breakage without "--objects".
>>>
>>> By adding the --objects switch to rev-list we make sure to do a complete
>>> check.
>>
>> You also need to drop "-n1" for the command to be equivalent to
>> quickfetch, I think.
>
> Ahh, I think I need to take it back.
>
> As the existing code relies not just on the exit status of rev-list
> but also checks if anything comes out of it, having "-n1" would not
> hurt.
>
> The case I was worried about was that we have all commits to connect
> $sha1 to what are reachable from refs, but some tree/blob objects
> referenced by these commits were missing.  By cutting the displaying
> with "-n1", rev-list may happily exit successfully after showing $sha1,
> without even realizing that some trees/blobs are missing and the history
> leading to $sha1 cannot be considered complete.
>
> But because the code checks the empty-ness of $rev, this case is diagnosed
> as "$sha1 is not reachable from any of the refs" correctly anyway,
> so it should be OK.

... this is embarrassing, but for exactly the same reason, I do not
think we need "--objects" either.  If $sha1 is not something that is
already reachable from any of the refs, "rev-list -n1" would show
something, making $rev non-empty, and it would result in a fetch,
whether the objects that are reachable from the commits between
existing refs and $sha1 are complete or not.  So it is pointless to
use "--objects" to test their presense.

Sorry about the noise ;-)

>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
>>> ---
>>>  git-submodule.sh | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh
>>> index 9bc5c5f..f5d6675 100755
>>> --- a/git-submodule.sh
>>> +++ b/git-submodule.sh
>>> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ Maybe you want to use 'update --init'?")"
>>>  				# Run fetch only if $sha1 isn't present or it
>>>  				# is not reachable from a ref.
>>>  				(clear_local_git_env; cd "$sm_path" &&
>>> -					( (rev=$(git rev-list -n 1 $sha1 --not --all 2>/dev/null) &&
>>> +					( (rev=$(git rev-list --objects -n 1 $sha1 --not --all 2>/dev/null) &&
>>>  					 test -z "$rev") || git-fetch)) ||
>>>  				die "$(eval_gettext "Unable to fetch in submodule path '\$displaypath'")"
>>>  			fi

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-22 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22 22:35 [PATCH 0/2] Submodule harden fetches (WAS: submodule: Fetch the direct sha1 first) Stefan Beller
2016-02-22 22:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] submodule: Include check for objects when fetching Stefan Beller
2016-02-22 22:54   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-22 23:06     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-22 23:18       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-02-22 22:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] submodule: Try harder to fetch needed sha1 by direct fetching sha1 Stefan Beller
2016-02-23  0:01   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-23  0:28     ` Stefan Beller
2016-02-23  6:38       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-24  3:32         ` [PATCH] " Stefan Beller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq7fhw49ly.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
    --cc=dborowitz@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jacob.keller@gmail.com \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).