From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EE120705 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751638AbcIIQKF (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:10:05 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54492 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751212AbcIIQKE (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:10:04 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6F13C545; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:10:02 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+5Q7VskIIlzFysAN5qSYQrNGh5I=; b=bPaMGd uswG1tfP8kECA0W/BZgNCCnrF0TIR49M6Hn2MV69uBKVFBpccAbKCuPy5m7nxNqr KGrYDW/Ubg0yhwYjRGJxXpfNE+xRMHaneyQ1bc5ipB0ad4a4+tfef23p0fmbdd93 Rx+AqqTw6j81S6nCi2kkGonosd7BtfCv1qh88= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=UUdDzlDF2hX6VXMi3VuBTbBMw7Jv36w3 CY/NWJzepXQAD85yBDimCsQ2x8EQwCISmszkcUZGppfysKpcWN1eftkqxaeVrkWk 7POd4fEqp2bQkYzOqFW95Lt9+VWdrZqu8KJ+2iygX0J8EMEmq30AAY7C2YuaNnOV ZrqyHTAT6mE= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1873C542; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:10:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 479A43C540; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:10:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Jeff King , Dakota Hawkins , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Issue with global config defaults "user.useConfigOnly = true" + "pull.rebase = preserve" - "user.email" References: <20160729181121.GB14953@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160729223134.GA22591@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 09:09:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:32:28 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DBFB787C-76A7-11E6-9C00-51057B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Do you have a preference either way to help us decide if we want to >> take this change or not? > > I have no strong preference. I guess that it does not hurt to go with the > patch, and it would probably help in a few cases. OK. Let me dig the change back and how well it still fits ;-) Thanks.