From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ABD1F6BF for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 21:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754664AbcIIVQL (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:16:11 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:58767 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752040AbcIIVQK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:16:10 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E9A3AF62; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:16:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=J2w9gqoEDew/DAqSHi7Tjdb2Upg=; b=h9Dre5 4q7O7zsa8TTxYuXzrgNfSs+vuVsOqMnN5IKxQc3qGAqQ2vgMVXvaPYWi3giNEPOJ XGsG/p/k6L4QD2HAFkvQmr+nZ5vdout+trd0U2MwiGeg1TUnQ7z1S/WBoo/r8uE/ Kjqba9lwin1pKSmGg7zsxfq1ryhp2/lSjHxtw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mgQipalUelArGBYVGKIzyP6QaIyxB4fz wihezI6QVuqGMQetzSzFrJPW0lsSRN5Wa2MyrIcsNZMtl1Vf39Ii77wThElTST3E 9PKJE5XY5Wgpc48pyUDfeZyqzo+DAFVDEW1lmTjnP2j7eTT3gBRa2LaZOCpsmhls ekEk2oWSihM= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915F63AF61; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:16:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DEA53AF60; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:16:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Josh Triplett Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move format-patch base commit and prerequisites before email signature References: <20160908011200.qzvbdt4wjwiji4h5@x> <20160908185408.5qtfnztjbastlrtw@x> <20160908200819.pkg7jqcvxjpdqr3a@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160909200721.xfkbud377ja4wkrt@x> <20160909210040.zlsczhcotrxnu4e4@x> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 14:16:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160909210040.zlsczhcotrxnu4e4@x> (Josh Triplett's message of "Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:00:41 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A09E9EB4-76D2-11E6-9341-F7BB12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Josh Triplett writes: > It doesn't seem like a functional issue, but aesthetically it > doesn't look good. > > Do you plan to make that change to print an additional blank line > (likely inside print_bases), or should I? I do not mind doing it myself, but I am already in today's integration cycle (which will merge a handful of topics to 'master'), so I won't get around to it for some time. If you are inclined to, please be my guest ;-) Thanks.