From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C9B1FF40 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752844AbcLSVDu (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:03:50 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64886 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752040AbcLSVDs (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:03:48 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B629859B53; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:03:47 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=GPLu/avH4dhzop5zXfFHkvY1+JY=; b=s+htfB +QCo5Xv/tAoBnzeHPiKT1XwNyoVNVr6AZ+hefC9s4Xcs83DMBqWmfeXeoA0990LY JkKI78K4LJ8ncPCjIyzY2yvXJUnXGKbp5yxPbYntFOKjReuOxbtpVKMf4X6mQuMu v/w42f8vWbOehu01lnDcsMVK3dPOxmd5a2Ya4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=EP+YofmaGkoefsmW+4jpf/h5NMwO/7PF 4GsTYUz7ITkTnUbViNBTJgTZMdgG8Mh6tfK0e+lAoLXo7Pt8td4YWSn+ktMNgjua 7HNjuurbJil+3V2/lAYQ9V7Uwl6jw4/LHn9Q26gYAnHBv0F8YK8j6DikpghUunVP KINUXAIYcM8= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE20659B52; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:03:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34F9D59B51; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:03:47 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Duy Nguyen Cc: Christian Couder , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Add configuration options for split-index References: <20161217145547.11748-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20161219120246.GE24125@ash> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:03:45 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20161219120246.GE24125@ash> (Duy Nguyen's message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:02:46 +0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A222AE82-C62E-11E6-8480-E98412518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Duy Nguyen writes: > I've read through the series (*) and I think it looks good, just a few > minor comments here and there. > > (*) guiltily admit that I only skimmed through tests, not giving them > as much attention as I should have OK. I'd still want to see them get reviewed, though. Perhaps I'll do so myself once I run out of things to do, but hopefully somebody else gets there first ;-) Thanks.