From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18B11FF32 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757686AbdJRALS (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:11:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57416 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757020AbdJRALR (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:11:17 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CC1A3FA1; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:11:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=82xoNGomlRXNjGMWPcZTLsnJojQ=; b=u0ottX v36fxDbCUXr/ayjZcQe1faLgKDGgh5noncE85aiLqG6cYaENaalLGvZzBRDXheRm KIYnQ7g2YI54HWamCE8Yb0PlblJ62KNJS0OQ9zYCDOwX9Lyq+utVcy+EhFt3KPkg LEmxcrICmWlbY6532rVBHAOXCHjrP/9dvtckM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kh5nLrvO7Bggi2ysWjbt3TEw+HEksDO3 M7KTYXor57U5LH5gstbCV/N9g8ckpuqKcwMI5YgG0AKDyMmPPKn9p0Nd3b0p6zCE 6IH9vkKGnWIfyqH/Ul/P0KnXUg3ln2Saj2xzffU5MWTlLPEHD0LnI04xnJ/HiMVd Q+HQDzOMa+Y= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4936FA3FA0; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:11:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD48BA3F9F; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:11:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: David Glasser Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: list filter-branch subdirectory-filter first References: <0102015f277a12fe-c69362e3-b14c-4b5c-abaa-4693fd6632c2-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <0102015f29b9128b-a8d6e31c-06f5-421c-989a-230a484482d3-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:11:15 +0900 In-Reply-To: <0102015f29b9128b-a8d6e31c-06f5-421c-989a-230a484482d3-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> (David Glasser's message of "Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:45:15 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DC24DDE6-B398-11E7-8E5F-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org David Glasser writes: > From: David Glasser > > The docs claim that filters are applied in the listed order, so > subdirectory-filter should come first. > > For consistency, apply the same order to the SYNOPSIS and the script's usage, as > well as the switch while parsing arguments. > > Add missing --prune-empty to the script's usage. > > Signed-off-by: David Glasser > --- Thanks for being extra careful. Will queue.