From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26F8202A0 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933842AbdKGPNk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:13:40 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:65220 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751844AbdKGPNj (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:13:39 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B68A70D9; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:13:38 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=vb4O3H68YL4BGlvI6lUIc9DFCII=; b=jqHV26 +q1F7VYipLfjbBF2ab7OlmO+WbyLOdsCiAoghZRkwxr1V64pNJzdlfFMazUoK6+x 8mW61boHaQavYMqS19zAQ0Pev8Dsola3L6hWp7vMnpjBDDSSlFQf24Le1Pl5GIUw IcHbMtQ7ILO28CBFb46T4ntt2a3Ig4Ml7JmiQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nNtjfHTre4sE7u53QPv4HDPkwUFMHGMo 8w4w/nlKKTe5LzFlII9ZS05WKJXCdAL7ue0sZRnUhMoJbUsyacUf6IaVTpxMDG7Q 5XbobL7CmriPQ3USvXe20JkkmHQgQ+9hd4Fg+fnvDCVmyqW3iblBcuUK6cPqLS6l eDKUPHS20jw= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF53DA70D7; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:13:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FCAEA70D3; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:13:38 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Git Mailing List , Johannes Schindelin , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/8] sequencer: don't die in print_commit_summary() References: <20170925101041.18344-1-phillip.wood@talktalk.net> <20171106112709.2121-1-phillip.wood@talktalk.net> <20171106112709.2121-6-phillip.wood@talktalk.net> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:13:37 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:18:16 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3B2B5E24-C3CE-11E7-A582-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > And this step is going in the right direction, but I am not sure if > this made the function safe enough to be called repeatedly from the > rebase machinery and we are ready to unleash this to the end users > and tell them it is safe to use it. Another possibility perhaps is that the function is safe to reuse already even without this patch, of course ;-).