From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C5B1F5AE for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728789AbgGGU56 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:57:58 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:63222 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726273AbgGGU56 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:57:58 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E5F62469; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:57:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=O9JhqSv1EFdMLDdEiCha5Qewz9Q=; b=c/ioZ2 zTIOk6HsjQQKn78jRLGza8cUkcGGVYylqbRjc48Q8TgFGBXXwpzrCMxia80CVyji qlfUUuh5C2e6WEQk9eJ4ps2NbsvU9UTLa55EYuQOInDWoiBdoiWCtF9X1jnGZ8u8 mKiK0FJgeBTJFDLKOKNt1q2NUruHzwMyJ4ong= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=QjfYpajGmqQYZbGf7kqrSjsZqmkhhknz XaYan5FfiRnNM8wkIccVyIvXFJOzwY07niW19tg2832eBCbA/eCgohVeZ76GaQJR sYGMNGo7BgYFproFNC3FuMCYlR6r2c/r5jLB1rXPt6sZM4lsUavqvgBWQHWQddkF gC4TCzZGtzo= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E54462467; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:57:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.231.104.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F108462466; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:57:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Denton Liu Cc: Git Mailing List , Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] t: replace incorrect test_must_fail usage (part 6) References: Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 13:57:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 07 Jul 2020 13:08:29 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8825025A-C094-11EA-AA9E-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: >> Changes since v1: >> >> * Add a code comment to force_color() >> >> * Do not allow nested env's in test_must_fail_acceptable() >> >> * Clean up the env-processing case code >> >> * Give an example on how to use `!`. > > Thanks for a resend. Now part #5 is in 'master', I can queue these > directly on top. It seems that the patch series lacks coverage for t9400 where we have test_expect_success 'cvs server does not run with vanilla git-shell' ' ( cd cvswork && CVS_SERVER=$WORKDIR/remote-cvs && export CVS_SERVER && test_must_fail cvs log merge ) ' which obviously needs to be converted before we declare that it is a hard error to feed a non-git command to test_must_fail.