From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9EB1F4B4 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 06:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726955AbgJJG35 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Oct 2020 02:29:57 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:55547 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726743AbgJJG3t (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Oct 2020 02:29:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A52E0ED1; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 02:29:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=SCztODXhJJoY1GjzE92xzj2DPbA=; b=DrqvP8 qLvs3UwbkiEzd988d+98M4p+SaNRzNPyhzS+BrejbCj6FKmAhKClVwQNHwVHOvTF +QSoghyvuBqK4Lrgseg11AByUQQYg27WrY5M1EMU37uSf3nOhK07g7TJmSfOtCub LWUTlM/40jjWBWn3G6iVAGf2z4a4utwz09rQE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Eb1Ci7DKTKH840o6zwJAH6paAk2Up3Au evwXj8xCKYwb/ityIf1LTBp1PPKUdzk8tDHZKq5iMyPNhrwgpPhxy6Coq6UUBSEo Wy6vXoGLzhlMTa03ekLTsS+9vtb/Glpp7gb3Y4B5t0xjWBQZnB3AV2PUmC38rtCr sKoGO2K0cPk= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55335E0ED0; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 02:29:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ED32E0ECF; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 02:29:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Chris Webster Cc: Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , "Chris. Webster via GitGitGadget" , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: github action - add check for whitespace errors References: <20200922170745.GA541915@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20201009175917.GA963340@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20201009181827.GA965760@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 23:29:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Chris Webster's message of "Fri, 9 Oct 2020 22:26:35 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FBB35006-0AC1-11EB-A2A4-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Chris Webster writes: > Thank you for moving forward with this. I apologize for not > re-reviewing the SubmittingPatches doc. I should have done that. > > Thanks to Johannes for the input on this before it was submitted. > Will work on improving the commit messages with more credits. Thank you to all, and especially to you Chris for pinging to revive the thread. Applied and pushed out. > Is there an opportunity here for a gitgitgadget command to send the > 'consensus reached' email? The value may be in deciding who is > getting the email and trying to select content from the PR comments.