From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF611F4B4 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 05:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729978AbgLRF3t (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:29:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:58681 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728138AbgLRF3s (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:29:48 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD1F9A608; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:29:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=je0iNSfWlTdkP2RmJjofhUW5ZCw=; b=oPmUU2 N+NncC0Z7/1u5lhfIHoLfbyfguBUYfXt1KRS8+1Et68TdFmIqO7p8Fzvj/sW+Puk s4uo4uDHmzvjD0rX9O6YGSoMyTaFnMe3OLCKUN6116JcARdgzXSMA/gJdDiOsRfQ 33UMU7ozsFFb1F7jNj5hr+E8QZm2p1do3pBXQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=d+yxdDTtXlheFxRqyGNkGPlG5APTW798 0czT2phqIX1r2mNjIMwJj+FLGFwmLwJldNan9/ST3oI670xfMgO8xo2s5J8TBrBe SyBDT842S1iv24n6cyWWHJj4tBZGYhsvU6f8slceG2RV0iTTHTjaUhw5m7+uggU+ 4NfLNbiFF8g= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D7B9A607; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:29:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE5E69A606; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 00:29:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Emily Shaffer Cc: Josh Steadmon , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , James Ramsay , Jonathan Nieder , "brian m. carlson" , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Phillip Wood , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] propose config-based hooks (part I) References: <20201014232447.3050579-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20201205014607.1464119-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20201216003408.GR36751@google.com> <20201216201625.GF3783238@google.com> <20201218020748.GI3783238@google.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 21:29:05 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20201218020748.GI3783238@google.com> (Emily Shaffer's message of "Thu, 17 Dec 2020 18:07:48 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F224A18C-40F1-11EB-BD59-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Emily Shaffer writes: > I don't have a reroll today. I have been trying to get to the bottom of > a test which fails when built with clang but passes when built with gcc > (t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh after patch 12 of the part II series) and > have not made progress on that, let alone on the other tasks I wanted to > do before sending the next version. Thanks for an interim report. No need to rush. > Hope you enjoy your holidays. You too, and have fun.