From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80D21F5AE for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230429AbhGUWia (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:38:30 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:62954 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230240AbhGUWi3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:38:29 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E519EC2B79; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:19:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=njRz2StScGy4 +Rm8mrd/3hIXS9JdUznfJYfbPOBWFdg=; b=BhxLXRBjmT4fe9kkvMZtA1oNbjv6 uG1D+ZHNLaZ8eUH1PxctG4dLkHi6GVzvg4GoCbOt6UBtuoMhTx/JFiXnWu9CC72Q ezFCsoGpK51v8SUfb1Z02/b4+DxQRssGYO1T9yljcChCbCuYeWIALisCwEOhKtBl wh7kjINEzW3NFcU= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41D0C2B78; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:19:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.3.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CCBDC2B77; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:19:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin , "Tom G . Christensen" , Mischa POSLAWSKY , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] http: rename CURLOPT_FILE to CURLOPT_WRITEDATA References: <20170809120024.7phdjzjv54uv5dpz@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:19:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyCUFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:22:16 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0A258670-EA7A-11EB-A8DD-8B3BC6D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > The CURLOPT_FILE name is an alias for CURLOPT_WRITEDATA, the > CURLOPT_WRITEDATA name has been preferred since curl 7.9.7, released > in May 2002[1]. Yes! _FILE has been deprecated since that version so this is definitely the right thing to do.