From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86871F55F for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=sasl header.b=Lj054X7c; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235498AbjITPne (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:43:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48828 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234622AbjITPnd (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:43:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F69B4 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA8E1AA477; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:43:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=64qlMB/N72yCOrymFJLvXvL6pXPo5VY0DSgGnZ DzcJk=; b=Lj054X7crpM0HM5P6/k6vuGEduSfwd+XdVwtaxYwg+14k/HGVmdfWs 5wzOkOKzuGkSa+vsq+uyyfGU28TPI2l48oz7sJuIUYiFI0x6jsst+uKdxo+3LJc/ EJMHMCwuy9+OlfO3i3/WdeyFsZKGxLumZmn6NEQlJIOhP8IdZJI44= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B2F1AA475; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:43:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.153.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CC711AA473; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:43:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Bagas Sanjaya Cc: Michael Strawbridge , Luben Tuikov , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Emily Shaffer , Doug Anderson , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] uninitialized value $address in git send-email In-Reply-To: (Bagas Sanjaya's message of "Wed, 20 Sep 2023 18:00:01 +0700") References: <8fcd6d2a-2c16-adf9-da1f-6b9d6fdcc87a@amd.com> <4eb0d21b-be43-529a-bfdd-3f1d2b4d3e84@amd.com> <118975ef-c07f-c397-5288-7698e60516a7@amd.com> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:43:24 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6FB2C266-57CC-11EE-B66A-78DCEB2EC81B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Bagas Sanjaya writes: > Originally, I was intended to report regression on handling multiple > addresses passed in a single --to/--cc/--bcc option. You refer to v2.40 and v2.41 in the message I am responding to, but do you have a bisection? There seem to have been five topics around send-email during that timeperiod. $ git log --oneline --first-parent v2.40.0..v2.41.0 git-send-email.perl b04671b638 Merge branch 'jc/send-email-pre-process-fix' 64477d20d7 Merge branch 'mc/send-email-header-cmd' b6e9521956 Merge branch 'ms/send-email-feed-header-to-validate-hook' c4c9d5586f Merge branch 'rj/send-email-validate-hook-count-messages' 647a2bb3ff Merge branch 'jc/spell-id-in-both-caps-in-message-id'