From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Update documentation for http.continue option Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:47:57 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1381530945-90590-1-git-send-email-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <1381530945-90590-3-git-send-email-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <20131011235052.GV9464@google.com> <20131012002639.GE79408@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> <20131018221535.GM865149@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> <20131022233257.GA9464@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "brian m. carlson" , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , Jeff King , Shawn Pearce To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 23 17:48:07 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ0fF-0007W7-8X for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:48:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751708Ab3JWPsA (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:48:00 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:57496 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751392Ab3JWPr7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:47:59 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA114D8C7; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:47:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=PychOCsl+R9bR+j1ZLF8wH7IO24=; b=IAZVNI IYt9Ta/zdmpBeFxeYkvRLr/P2ABMjBsLB2XjMXEXHOQtGf30fSdGS1YTB0M97F2m XA6VrzJV+BQ59RWlXb78K1Bp/AhyWuPUikYgBY5eRdnFX90Wjhe+29lD8hW4/fIG 5oRpDIVYS/f6iSqeCYXpM38G4bjA3+0tXj5d0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=jY7oFyA0f5w+PizpQG4T288o2CotbLRD i9TWcbHqzH5HboeVULr082HUwgWRy2MLnzMdlWTY4QmhU1N67/9w4s1B2bmFSPiz YIMfoCYDq2CSxB/PddpnSmet1xyDbXJpcwxjjMJI8jFyurx2NMDkeAfV6xE+YLuX 5YAYlIBsws4= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BCD4D8C5; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 809024D8C1; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:47:58 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <20131022233257.GA9464@google.com> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:32:58 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7D95C12E-3BFA-11E3-A3C3-8F264F2CC097-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonathan Nieder writes: > Wouldn't a natural fix be to *always* use "Expect: 100-continue" when > and only when the probe_rpc() revealed a server supporting > GSS-Negotiate authentication? A stupid question. Is GSS-Negotiate the only special case?